No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[Stefan Richter]

Stefan Richter wrote on 2007-10-13:
> bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9160

It's a 100% reproducible oops on Sparc (with FireWire controller) for
2.6.23 and 2.6.24 kernels, but not 2.6.22.  The reporter confirmed that
the bug also happens
  - with plain 2.6.24-rc5,
  - with 2.6.23.y and the firewire subsystem fully reverted to that of
    2.6.22.

This has also been reported independently once before against
2.6.23-rc3, http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparc&m=118751438108687 in August.

>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus OOPS: Bogus kernel PC [0000000000000000] in fault handler
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus OOPS: RPC [0000000010068cd0]
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus RPC: <ar_context_add_page+0xd8/0x160 [firewire_ohci]>
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus OOPS: Fault was to vaddr[1004e000]
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus Call Trace:
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [00000000004076f4] sparc64_realfault_common+0x18/0x20
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [0000000010068cd0] ar_context_add_page+0xd8/0x160 [firewire_ohci]
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [0000000010068d90] ar_context_init+0x38/0x60 [firewire_ohci]
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [000000001006ac50] pci_probe+0xf8/0x340 [firewire_ohci]
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [00000000005299bc] pci_device_probe+0x64/0xa0
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [0000000000550a28] driver_probe_device+0x90/0x1c0
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [0000000000550bc0] __driver_attach+0x68/0x80
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [000000000054fe5c] bus_for_each_dev+0x44/0x80
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [0000000000550218] bus_add_driver+0x80/0x1c0
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [0000000000529b7c] __pci_register_driver+0x44/0xa0
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [000000000047d5cc] sys_init_module+0x134/0x1400
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [0000000000406094] linux_sparc_syscall32+0x3c/0x40
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus [00000000000133d8] 0x133e0
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus tsk->{mm,active_mm}->context = 00000000000001f9
>> Oct 13 20:26:04 succubus tsk->{mm,active_mm}->pgd = fffff8004f9f8000
[...]

The fault happens due to dma_sync_single_for_device() which
drivers/firewire/fw-ohci.c calls in ar_context_add_page() when still
being in its pci_probe method.  I suspect that --- at least on Sparc and
after 2.6.22 --- it is not possible anymore to use dma_sync_* before the
pci_device's or device's probe was finished.

Would that be a bug in the Sparc platform code?  Or a bug in driver core
code or in PCI code?  Or am I expected to refrain from dma_sync_* calls
until after the probe returned?

(Doing the latter might be tricky, but I suspect that the AR buffers in
fw-ohci would generally be better off using coherent allocations.  The
DMA mapping and syncing in this part of fw-ohci is currently slightly
messy.)

Thanks for any comments,
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ==-- =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[David Miller]

From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:53:03 +0100

> The fault happens due to dma_sync_single_for_device() which
> drivers/firewire/fw-ohci.c calls in ar_context_add_page() when still
> being in its pci_probe method.  I suspect that --- at least on Sparc and
> after 2.6.22 --- it is not possible anymore to use dma_sync_* before the
> pci_device's or device's probe was finished.
> 
> Would that be a bug in the Sparc platform code?  Or a bug in driver core
> code or in PCI code?  Or am I expected to refrain from dma_sync_* calls
> until after the probe returned?

The problem is likely what device struct you are passing to
dma_sync_single_for_device(), it has to be a real pci_dev or similar
that has it's dev_archdata properly initialized.

I bet dev_archdata in whatever "struct device" is being passed in has
a NULL iommu pointer or something like that.

Oh yeah, I see what you're doing, that won't work, please pass in
the correct device struct pointer.  Please pass in the &pci_dev->dev
not this ohci->card.device thing.

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[Stefan Richter]

[As pointed out elsewhere in the thread, this is indeed about sparc64,
not sparc per se.]

David Miller wrote:
> From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:53:03 +0100
> 
>> The fault happens due to dma_sync_single_for_device() which
>> drivers/firewire/fw-ohci.c calls in ar_context_add_page() when still
>> being in its pci_probe method.  I suspect that --- at least on Sparc and
>> after 2.6.22 --- it is not possible anymore to use dma_sync_* before the
>> pci_device's or device's probe was finished.
>> 
>> Would that be a bug in the Sparc platform code?  Or a bug in driver core
>> code or in PCI code?  Or am I expected to refrain from dma_sync_* calls
>> until after the probe returned?
> 
> The problem is likely what device struct you are passing to
> dma_sync_single_for_device(), it has to be a real pci_dev or similar
> that has it's dev_archdata properly initialized.
> 
> I bet dev_archdata in whatever "struct device" is being passed in has
> a NULL iommu pointer or something like that.
> 
> Oh yeah, I see what you're doing, that won't work, please pass in
> the correct device struct pointer.  Please pass in the &pci_dev->dev
> not this ohci->card.device thing.

No, the dev argument is alright.  We use it a few lines above in the
same function in a call to dma_map_single().  The dev argument is IMO
correctly obtained here:

static int
pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
{
	...
	fw_card_initialize(&ohci->card, &ohci_driver, &dev->dev);
	...
}

void
fw_card_initialize(struct fw_card *card, const struct fw_card_driver
*driver, struct device *device)
{
	...
	card->device = device;
	...
}

So, ohci->card.device is in fact &pci_dev->dev.

Also note:
  - The very same code did not oops at this point in 2.6.22.  It only
    started doing so in 2.6.23.
  - There has been no other report of this kind for any other
    architecture yet.  I would expect e.g. the PPC64 folks to report
    bugs in our dma mappings eventually.

-----
Two footnotes:

  - Although the 2.6.22 firewire subsystem does not oops during the
pci_probe like it does in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24, it does lock up sometime
later during actual use.  However this is not surprising, as I found and
fixed some portential DMA mapping issues in the fw-sbp2 highlevel driver
sometime after 2.6.22.  But due to the pci_probe problem, the firewire
subsystem doesn't get as far on sparc64 on 2.6.23 and 2.6.24.

  - One thing which we do slightly wrong in ar_context_add_page() is that we
1.) dma-map the buffer,
2.) continue to write into the buffer from the CPU,
3.) then sync it for the device.
I let the reporter try a patch which inserted a
dma_sync_single_for_cpu() right after the dma_map_single() in order to
be clearly entitled to access the buffer by the CPU, but that didn't fix it.

-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ==-- =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[David Miller]

From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:38:27 +0100

> Also note:
>   - The very same code did not oops at this point in 2.6.22.  It only
>     started doing so in 2.6.23.

2.6.23 is when the sparc64 IOMMU code started relying upon
the dev_archdata bits being correct.

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[Stefan Richter]

David Miller wrote:
> From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:38:27 +0100
> 
>> Also note:
>>   - The very same code did not oops at this point in 2.6.22.  It only
>>     started doing so in 2.6.23.
> 
> 2.6.23 is when the sparc64 IOMMU code started relying upon
> the dev_archdata bits being correct.

And why are the dev_archdata corrupt?
Does arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c fill them in incorrectly or too late?

drivers/firewire/fw_ohci.c needs them for dma_map_single() +
dma_sync_single_for_device() in the pci_driver.probe(), sometime after
it called pci_enable_device(), before finishing the probe.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ==-- =--==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[David Miller]

From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:33:05 +0100

> drivers/firewire/fw_ohci.c needs them for dma_map_single() +
> dma_sync_single_for_device() in the pci_driver.probe(), sometime after
> it called pci_enable_device(), before finishing the probe.

I'll take a look at this and try to figure out exactly
what might be going wrong.

The dev_archdata should be fully setup at this time.

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[David Miller]

From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:33:05 +0100

> Does arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c fill them in incorrectly or too late?

The problem is that I created indirection that was totally unused, the
operation vectors members for these cases thus didn't get filled in,
and we OOPS trying to call NULL pointers as functions :-)

This should fix the crash:

diff --git a/include/asm-sparc64/dma-mapping.h b/include/asm-sparc64/dma-mapping.h
index 1fc6554..38cbec7 100644
--- a/include/asm-sparc64/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/asm-sparc64/dma-mapping.h
@@ -25,15 +25,9 @@ struct dma_ops {
 	void (*sync_single_for_cpu)(struct device *dev,
 				    dma_addr_t dma_handle, size_t size,
 				    enum dma_data_direction direction);
-	void (*sync_single_for_device)(struct device *dev,
-				       dma_addr_t dma_handle, size_t size,
-				       enum dma_data_direction direction);
 	void (*sync_sg_for_cpu)(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
 				int nelems,
 				enum dma_data_direction direction);
-	void (*sync_sg_for_device)(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
-				   int nelems,
-				   enum dma_data_direction direction);
 };
 extern const struct dma_ops *dma_ops;
 
@@ -105,7 +99,7 @@ static inline void dma_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev,
 					      size_t size,
 					      enum dma_data_direction direction)
 {
-	dma_ops->sync_single_for_device(dev, dma_handle, size, direction);
+	/* No flushing needed to sync cpu writes to the device.  */
 }
 
 static inline void dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu(struct device *dev,
@@ -123,7 +117,7 @@ static inline void dma_sync_single_range_for_device(struct device *dev,
 						    size_t size,
 						    enum dma_data_direction direction)
 {
-	dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, dma_handle+offset, size, direction);
+	/* No flushing needed to sync cpu writes to the device.  */
 }
 
 
@@ -138,7 +132,7 @@ static inline void dma_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
 					  struct scatterlist *sg, int nelems,
 					  enum dma_data_direction direction)
 {
-	dma_ops->sync_sg_for_device(dev, sg, nelems, direction);
+	/* No flushing needed to sync cpu writes to the device.  */
 }
 
 static inline int dma_mapping_error(dma_addr_t dma_addr)

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[Emanuele Rocca]

* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, [2007-12-20  0:40 -0800]:
>  The problem is that I created indirection that was totally unused, the
>  operation vectors members for these cases thus didn't get filled in,
>  and we OOPS trying to call NULL pointers as functions :-)
>  
>  This should fix the crash:

It does, tested on a Sun Blade 2000.

Thank you David.
ciao,
    ema

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[Stefan Richter]

Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> * David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, [2007-12-20  0:40 -0800]:
>>  The problem is that I created indirection that was totally unused, the
>>  operation vectors members for these cases thus didn't get filled in,
>>  and we OOPS trying to call NULL pointers as functions :-)
>>  
>>  This should fix the crash:
> 
> It does, tested on a Sun Blade 2000.

Thanks David and Emanuele.  I haven't got feedback from the other
reporter yet but I assume this fixes the issue
(http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9160).
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ==-- =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[David Miller]

From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:38:27 +0100

>   - There has been no other report of this kind for any other
>     architecture yet.  I would expect e.g. the PPC64 folks to report
>     bugs in our dma mappings eventually.

Irrelevant fact, powerpc handles it's dev_archdata differently
from sparc64.

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 11:38 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> So, ohci->card.device is in fact &pci_dev->dev.
> 
> Also note:
>   - The very same code did not oops at this point in 2.6.22.  It only
>     started doing so in 2.6.23.
>   - There has been no other report of this kind for any other
>     architecture yet.  I would expect e.g. the PPC64 folks to report
>     bugs in our dma mappings eventually.

Ignore my previous message... if you are indeed passing &pci_dev->dev,
it should work.

Ben.

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 16:50 -0800, David Miller wrote:

> The problem is likely what device struct you are passing to
> dma_sync_single_for_device(), it has to be a real pci_dev or similar
> that has it's dev_archdata properly initialized.
> 
> I bet dev_archdata in whatever "struct device" is being passed in has
> a NULL iommu pointer or something like that.
> 
> Oh yeah, I see what you're doing, that won't work, please pass in
> the correct device struct pointer.  Please pass in the &pci_dev->dev
> not this ohci->card.device thing.

Yup, this would crash on powerpc 64 bits as well for the same reason.

Ben.

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[Chris Newport]

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:

> It's a 100% reproducible oops on Sparc (with FireWire controller) for
> 2.6.23 and 2.6.24 kernels, but not 2.6.22.  The reporter confirmed that
> the bug also happens

How do you achieve a sparc system with firewire ?
AFAIK there is no SBUS firewire card.

Only sparc64 and some rare javastations have PCI slots.

Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

[David Miller]

From: Chris Newport <crn@netunix.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:58:29 +0000 (GMT)

> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:
> 
> > It's a 100% reproducible oops on Sparc (with FireWire controller) for
> > 2.6.23 and 2.6.24 kernels, but not 2.6.22.  The reporter confirmed that
> > the bug also happens
> 
> How do you achieve a sparc system with firewire ?
> AFAIK there is no SBUS firewire card.

He means sparc64, which have PCI firewire onboard many
systems.