From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757150AbXLSVJG (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:09:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753587AbXLSVIz (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:08:55 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:53606 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753580AbXLSVIy (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:08:54 -0500 Subject: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org To: Stefan Richter Cc: David Miller , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, krh@bitplanet.net, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <4767A323.7090205@s5r6.in-berlin.de> References: <47112797.7060003@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <47670BDF.80409@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20071217.165032.41424988.davem@davemloft.net> <4767A323.7090205@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:08:13 +1100 Message-Id: <1198098493.31714.2.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 11:38 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote: > So, ohci->card.device is in fact &pci_dev->dev. > > Also note: > - The very same code did not oops at this point in 2.6.22. It only > started doing so in 2.6.23. > - There has been no other report of this kind for any other > architecture yet. I would expect e.g. the PPC64 folks to report > bugs in our dma mappings eventually. Ignore my previous message... if you are indeed passing &pci_dev->dev, it should work. Ben.