From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760067AbXLTUV5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:21:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753705AbXLTUVt (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:21:49 -0500 Received: from E23SMTP05.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.174]:41194 "EHLO e23smtp05.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751184AbXLTUVs (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:21:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [ofa-general] iommu dma mapping alignment requirements From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Reply-To: benh@au1.ibm.com To: Steve Wise Cc: Roland Dreier , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, OpenFabrics General , Wen Xiong , Olof Johansson , Paul Mackerras In-Reply-To: <476AC2A5.8060200@opengridcomputing.com> References: <476AA2E2.5010007@opengridcomputing.com> <476ABE60.9030805@opengridcomputing.com> <476AC2A5.8060200@opengridcomputing.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Ozlabs Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 07:21:01 +1100 Message-Id: <1198182061.6779.7.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 13:29 -0600, Steve Wise wrote: > Or based on the alignment of vaddr actually... The later wouldn't be realistic. What I think might be necessay, though it would definitely cause us problems with running out of iommu space (which is the reason we did the switch down to 4K), is to provide alignment to the real page size, and alignement to the allocation order for dma_map_consistent. It might be possible to -tweak- and only provide alignment to the page size for allocations that are larger than IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE. That would solve the problem with small network packets eating up too much iommu space though. What do you think ? Ben.