From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
jgarzik@pobox.com, Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
wingel@nano-system.com,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
james.smart@emulex.com, linux-driver@qlogic.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/4] [POWERPC] pci: Disable IO/Mem on a device when resources can't be allocated
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 08:20:53 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1198617653.7209.4.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071224072301.GD3758@colo.lackof.org>
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 00:23 -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:01:15AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > This patch changes the PowerPC PCI code to disable IO and/or Memory
> > decoding on a PCI device when a resource of that type failed to be
> > allocated. This is done to avoid having unallocated dangling BARs enabled
> > that might try to decode on top of other devices.
> >
> > If a proper resource is assigned later on, then pci_enable_device{,_io,_mem}
> > will take care of re-enabling decoding.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ....
> > @@ -1062,8 +1065,12 @@ static void __init pcibios_allocate_reso
> > disabled = !(command & PCI_COMMAND_IO);
> > else
> > disabled = !(command & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY);
> > - if (pass == disabled)
> > - alloc_resource(dev, idx);
> > + if (pass == disabled && alloc_resource(dev, idx)) {
> > + command &= ~(r->flags & (IORESOURCE_IO |
> > + IORESOURCE_MEM));
>
> While this may be ok for PPC, in general, wouldn't we want to only disable
> which ever type of resource that couldn't be allocated?
This is exactly what's supposed to be happening, but the code is buggy
and nobody noticed :-) (I'm mixing up IORESOURCE_* flags and
PCI_COMMAND_* flags). Thanks for reviewing !
> ie make two calls: alloc_resource_io() and alloc_resource_mem() and disable
> the respective flag if the alloc call fails?
No need for 2 calls, just disable whatever type the resource is, but
using the right bits instead of what my code incorrectly does.
> Thus a device which was enable and programmed by BIOS could remain functional
> despite one resource not being allocated.
Yes, that's what intended by the above code, if I didn't have mixed up
the flags.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-25 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-17 23:01 [RFC/PATCH 1/4] pci: Add pci_enable_device_{io,mem} intefaces Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-17 23:01 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/4] pci: Remove users of pci_enable_device_bars() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-18 0:07 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-18 0:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-24 7:13 ` Grant Grundler
2007-12-17 23:01 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/4] pci: Remove pci_enable_device_bars() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-24 7:08 ` Grant Grundler
2007-12-25 21:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-17 23:01 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/4] [POWERPC] pci: Disable IO/Mem on a device when resources can't be allocated Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-18 9:56 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2007-12-18 11:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-24 7:23 ` Grant Grundler
2007-12-25 21:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-12-25 21:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-27 21:03 ` Grant Grundler
2007-12-17 23:49 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/4] pci: Add pci_enable_device_{io,mem} intefaces Johannes Weiner
2007-12-17 23:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-18 0:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-18 9:37 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2007-12-18 9:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-19 5:10 ` [RFC/PATCH]] x86: pci: Disable IO/Mem on a device when resources can't be allocated Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-19 13:43 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2007-12-19 20:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1198617653.7209.4.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-driver@qlogic.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=wingel@nano-system.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox