public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:33:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1198722793.7320.15.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071227015716.GA6718@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 20:57 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[...]
> > 9. Now, you are in the original kernel again. You can read/write the
> >    memory image of kexeced kernel via /proc/kimgcore.
> > 
> 
> Why do we need two interfaces, /proc/vmcore and /proc/kimgcore? Can't
> we have just one say /proc/vmcore. Irrespective of what kernel you are
> in /proc/vmcore gives you the access to the memory of kernel which was
> previously booted.

In theory we can kexec another kernel even in a kexeced kernel, that is,
in kernel A kexec kernel B, and in kernel B kexec another kernel C. In
this situation, both /proc/vmcore and /proc/kimgcore has valid contents.
So I think, it may be better to keep two interfaces.

In fact, current kexec jump implementation use a dummy "jump back helper
image" in kexeced kernel to jump back to the original kernel. The "jump
back helper image" has no PT_LOAD segment, it is used to provide a
struct kimage (including control page, swap page) and entry point to
jump back.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-27  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-21  7:33 [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8 Huang, Ying
2007-12-21  8:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-12-21  8:53   ` Huang, Ying
2007-12-27  1:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-12-27  2:33   ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2007-12-27 18:12     ` Vivek Goyal
2007-12-28  7:30       ` Huang, Ying
2007-12-28 21:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-12-29  2:00   ` Huang, Ying
2007-12-31 19:26     ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-03  8:42       ` Huang, Ying
2008-01-06 20:49         ` Vivek Goyal
2008-01-07  8:12           ` Huang, Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1198722793.7320.15.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox