public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done"
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:12:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1199304735.3258.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080102194030.GC11638@parisc-linux.org>


On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 12:40 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:19:14AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > It's totally immaterial if we have one reporter or many. The fact is, that 
> > thing has been outstanding for almost two months now. The root cause is 
> > almost certainly known (and Matthew is apparently even aware of it), but 
> 
> I really don't think the root cause is known.
> 
> > By now, it needs to either have a patch, or to be reverted. It's too late 
> > to make excuses.
> 
> I think reverting it is the correct thing to do.

OK ... I'll revert it.  However, I still think it's the wrong course of
action, because as far as my analysis goes, this code is functionally
equivalent to what went before with the exception that we now rely on
the request->cmd_type information in the post processing (previously we
just relied on the cmnd->done pointer).

As far as I understand what's going on, the reporter is misusing the
interface.  He sets up a packet mapping and then accesses the underlying
device, which is wrong (you're supposed to access now via the packet
device).  The one thing the packet mapping does is to alter the
blocksize, which could lead to the errors reported (because the
underlying fs block size and the actual block size differ) ... however,
I think it should do this all the time, so what I'm unable to explain is
why it doesn't write past the end of the device with this commit
reverted.

But all of the above is the hallmark of an existing bug that this commit
exposes ... revert it, and we'll cover the underlying problem up again.

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-01-02 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-02 16:25 [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done" Ingo Molnar
2008-01-02 16:46 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-02 19:19   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-02 19:40     ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-02 19:57       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-02 20:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-02 20:49           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-02 20:53             ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-02 20:18         ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-02 20:12       ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-01-02 20:45         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-02 23:33           ` James Bottomley
2008-01-03  1:58             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-06  2:55               ` Peter Osterlund
2008-01-06  3:43                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-06 10:17                   ` Peter Osterlund
2008-01-06 14:04                   ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 14:42                   ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 15:01                     ` Peter Osterlund
2008-01-06 18:14                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-06 18:44                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-06 18:54                         ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 16:19                   ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-06 16:47                     ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 13:57                 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 14:47                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-06 15:20                     ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 15:45                       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06 16:00                         ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 16:12                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-06 17:10                         ` James Bottomley
2008-01-08 16:55                           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-06 17:11                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-06 17:36                         ` James Bottomley
2008-01-06 18:34                           ` Willy Tarreau
2008-01-06 18:56                             ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06 19:10                               ` Willy Tarreau
2008-01-06 19:58                                 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-06 21:08                                   ` Willy Tarreau
2008-01-06 22:25                                     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-07 20:50                                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-07 21:31                                       ` Alan Cox
2008-01-07 21:37                                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-07 23:04                                         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-07 23:19                                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-01-08 16:47                                             ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-08 17:11                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-08 20:01                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09  4:01                                             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-09  4:10                                               ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-09  6:03                                                 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-01-09  4:03                                             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-07 15:25                                 ` John Stoffel
2008-01-07 19:04                                   ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-07 19:59                                     ` John Stoffel
2008-01-06 17:29                     ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-06 20:26                       ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-06 13:55 Thomas Meyer
2008-01-06 16:56 ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1199304735.3258.53.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox