From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, qbarnes <qbarnes@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Use is_kprobe_fault to better match usage
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:05:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1199322323.6323.76.camel@brick> (raw)
Currently the notify_page_fault helper is used to test it the page
fault was caused by a kprobe causing an early return from do_page_fault.
Change the name of the helper to is_kprobe_fault to match the usage and
remove the preempt_disable/enable pair around kprobe_running() with an
explicit test for preemption. The idea for this comes from a patch
by Quentin Barnes to kprobes.c
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
---
Ingo, this may not be functionally equivalent, feel free to yank it out
if there is any trouble, but from what I've seen it should be OK.
Did you ever find a good kprobes test?
arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
index 051a4ec..5c48cc2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/mman.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/tty.h>
@@ -42,23 +43,20 @@
#define PF_RSVD (1<<3)
#define PF_INSTR (1<<4)
-static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static inline int is_kprobe_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
int ret = 0;
-
- /* kprobe_running() needs smp_processor_id() */
- if (!user_mode_vm(regs)) {
- preempt_disable();
- if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, 14))
- ret = 1;
- preempt_enable();
- }
-
- return ret;
-#else
- return 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
+ /*
+ * If it is a kprobe fault we can not be premptible so return before
+ * calling kprobe_running() as it will assert on smp_processor_id if
+ * preemption is enabled.
+ */
+ if (!user_mode_vm(regs) && !preemptible() && kprobe_running() &&
+ kprobe_fault_handler(regs, 14))
+ ret = 1;
#endif
+ return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
@@ -428,7 +426,7 @@ void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
return;
}
#endif
- if (notify_page_fault(regs))
+ if (is_kprobe_fault(regs))
return;
/*
* Don't take the mm semaphore here. If we fixup a prefetch
@@ -437,7 +435,7 @@ void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
goto bad_area_nosemaphore;
}
- if (notify_page_fault(regs))
+ if (is_kprobe_fault(regs))
return;
/* It's safe to allow irq's after cr2 has been saved and the vmalloc
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
index 97b92b6..09008e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/mman.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/tty.h>
@@ -45,23 +46,20 @@
#define PF_RSVD (1<<3)
#define PF_INSTR (1<<4)
-static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static inline int is_kprobe_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
int ret = 0;
-
- /* kprobe_running() needs smp_processor_id() */
- if (!user_mode(regs)) {
- preempt_disable();
- if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, 14))
- ret = 1;
- preempt_enable();
- }
-
- return ret;
-#else
- return 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
+ /*
+ * If it is a kprobe fault we can not be premptible so return before
+ * calling kprobe_running() as it will assert on smp_processor_id if
+ * preemption is enabled.
+ */
+ if (!user_mode_vm(regs) && !preemptible() && kprobe_running() &&
+ kprobe_fault_handler(regs, 14))
+ ret = 1;
#endif
+ return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
@@ -478,7 +476,7 @@ asmlinkage void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
return;
}
#endif
- if (notify_page_fault(regs))
+ if (is_kprobe_fault(regs))
return;
/*
* Don't take the mm semaphore here. If we fixup a prefetch
@@ -487,7 +485,7 @@ asmlinkage void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
goto bad_area_nosemaphore;
}
- if (notify_page_fault(regs))
+ if (is_kprobe_fault(regs))
return;
if (likely(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF))
--
1.5.4.rc2.1097.gb6e0d
next reply other threads:[~2008-01-03 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-03 1:05 Harvey Harrison [this message]
2008-01-03 2:36 ` [PATCH] x86: Use is_kprobe_fault to better match usage Masami Hiramatsu
2008-01-03 3:00 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-01-03 3:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-01-03 9:38 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1199322323.6323.76.camel@brick \
--to=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=qbarnes@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox