From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org (mout-p-101.mailbox.org [80.241.56.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFE02D7DD4 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 10:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756117527; cv=none; b=ZMEj14wqjrcLlF7eaSDf/M/0kbzFGVOVWepO6itGap4cVcuI16z40KPVaSUXvgbxrgzsFIgFFPtj+wQVz73U/TcjbxwQqpL13gQmOdzt5G5ILOjjhVDriofpataCq6Vim8ZEGotnzIa0emBhIn84fj8zMjVbykIxiSSLO9dBUgg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756117527; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KaOLmHjViwkxoihfBvJijmb+AB4Bem7L4iWvQKuY0Ac=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Y3GkYdTSc3Cs3eVVXuDw9Yh2QCzb4YdQeNHecB0GcT1tUKran/32CH3dg2WiNTRGtFc+2xSt9ytw5VB5dkszQ0yqqFH+1H1Js/byvZ/Q6KSLu3YjZSYS0vCNTY+x3/EQDHew9xYAuSxPLMD65rIn9zSHaXe0r8PY/FcZt9pG+g0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=rZ6GOAv6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="rZ6GOAv6" Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4c9Rkn68K9z9sXk; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:25:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1756117522; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KaOLmHjViwkxoihfBvJijmb+AB4Bem7L4iWvQKuY0Ac=; b=rZ6GOAv6aAOu5wR1f2bNtYPctYxa+S5yZavg9XjYHkFxw1kIMlJKecMV+d2I2MfSfUUuPf zRksQmq3TbjEmRQeSwbxI//6gL7kAVks1tLqrpaunCWjJqHMghlykx9ScJcfU6SEwcdtA0 s2+e8uZThG+uGozzKG9c3SPn99fNWZ1r0rBQgfgt90WiqlTMS7s6Pn9P8Ky78T+3+uGD2d /IpZ0pdiRKfWkLscBawRKNSB8N8Ng0IkHZISx8s291X5VX0fjdyL8fcdeKwRkoh9p4Qc6o OLN2+PeqFs09vRl7Eae4//rIJJO0yMzYP3IEKpdLRagu7k5FlZoenZNQZbK+Tg== Message-ID: <119cb44579d745ad3e47d649e6ee6fea9fd9d146.camel@mailbox.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sched/tests: Remove redundant header files From: Philipp Stanner Reply-To: phasta@kernel.org To: Markus Elfring , Liao Yuanhong , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: LKML , Christian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Danilo Krummrich , David Airlie , Maarten Lankhorst , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ma=EDra?= Canal , Matthew Brost , Maxime Ripard , Philipp Stanner , Simona Vetter , Thomas Zimmermann , Tvrtko Ursulin Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:25:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20250819142630.368796-1-liaoyuanhong@vivo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MBO-RS-ID: 2f8a2bff1c7e893a0bc X-MBO-RS-META: ajj4b1uysb5akw61sk99hyzimx7fd98c On Tue, 2025-08-19 at 18:15 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > The header file is already included on line 8. Remove = the > > redundant include. >=20 > You would like to omit a duplicate #include directive, don't you? > Will a corresponding refinement become helpful for the summary phrase > and change description? I don't understand what you mean. Can you elaborate? Both patch content and description are completely fine as far as I'm concerned. P. >=20 > Regards, > Markus