From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760447AbYALWQ2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:16:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755255AbYALWQT (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:16:19 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.189]:55049 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754781AbYALWQS (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:16:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=lKItoQTwqNkUhvTcBaqNE8plvaOXBpxtUmS/AENX1RShAAJ8r3bQKgz9fEpDDb2a/YPWvVsyhPUtME76Aa5CjohnfqTvTD4IH9m4erf3anA0/dQ07UZ7HajRG3g5PT8QTOYM2GYYhwIPEknWOTBCwNt/IrZJssI+cIJdSIGTsi0= Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 From: Harvey Harrison To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Adrian Bunk In-Reply-To: <200801122205.34871.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200801122205.34871.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:16:24 -0800 Message-Id: <1200176184.19760.100.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the > appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?] Perhaps keep the regression report as-is, but for each regression with a patch follow up with an appropriately CC'd reply to the regression report. Similar in concept to the regression report being patch 0/X or how the -stable series patches are announced? Harvey