public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] clk: rockchip: disable init state before mmc card initialization
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:01:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <120036049.vlT25D4un8@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440404863-14350-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

Hi Shawn,

Am Montag, 24. August 2015, 16:27:43 schrieb Shawn Lin:
> mmc host controller's IO input/output timing is unpredictable if
> bootloader execute tuning for HS200 mode. It might make kernel failed
> to initialize mmc card in identification mode. The root cause is
> tuning phase and degree setting for HS200 mode in bootloader aren't
> applicable to that of identification mode in kernel stage. Anyway, we
> can't force all bootloaders to disable tuning phase and degree setting
> before into kernel. Simply disable it in rockchip_clk_register_mmc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-mmc-phase.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-mmc-phase.c
> b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-mmc-phase.c index e9f8df32..ae21592 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-mmc-phase.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-mmc-phase.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ static unsigned long rockchip_mmc_recalc(struct clk_hw
> *hw, #define ROCKCHIP_MMC_DEGREE_MASK 0x3
>  #define ROCKCHIP_MMC_DELAYNUM_OFFSET 2
>  #define ROCKCHIP_MMC_DELAYNUM_MASK (0xff << ROCKCHIP_MMC_DELAYNUM_OFFSET)
> +#define ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_DISABLE (0x1)
> +#define ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_SHIFT (1)
> +#define ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_MASK  (0x1)

you don't need the "()" around primitive values. Also I don't think you need 
the second MASK attribute, doing
	writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_DISABLE,
				     ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_DISABLE,
				     mmc_clock->shift),

should be enough. And thirdly I'm undecided about the naming of the constant. 
The manual describes the init_state as "Assert init_state to soft reset the 
CLKGEN.", so I guess I'd prefer

	ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_RESET

or so

> 
>  #define PSECS_PER_SEC 1000000000000LL
> 
> @@ -119,6 +122,21 @@ static const struct clk_ops rockchip_mmc_clk_ops = {
>  	.set_phase	= rockchip_mmc_set_phase,
>  };
> 
> +static void rockchip_clk_mmc_disable_init(struct rockchip_mmc_clock

I guess similar to the thoughts above, simply name this
	rockchip_clk_mmc_reset()

or alternatively just do the reset in rockchip_clk_register_mmc directly:

if (mmc_clock->shift == ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_SHIFT))
	writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_DISABLE,
				     ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_MASK,
			     mmc_clock->shift),
	       mmc_clock->reg);

as the pr_debug does not really serve a purpose.


Heiko

> *mmc_clock) +{
> +	if (mmc_clock->shift != ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_SHIFT)
> +		return;
> +
> +	writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_DISABLE,
> +			     ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_MASK,
> +			     mmc_clock->shift),
> +	       mmc_clock->reg);
> +
> +	pr_debug("%s: clear mmc init state to %d", __func__,
> +		 (readl(mmc_clock->reg) >> (mmc_clock->shift)) &
> +		 ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_MASK);
> +}
> +
>  struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_mmc(const char *name,
>  				const char *const *parent_names, u8 num_parents,
>  				void __iomem *reg, int shift)
> @@ -139,6 +157,8 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_mmc(const char *name,
>  	mmc_clock->reg = reg;
>  	mmc_clock->shift = shift;
> 
> +	rockchip_clk_mmc_disable_init(mmc_clock);
> +
>  	if (name)
>  		init.name = name;


  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-24 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-24  8:27 [RESEND PATCH] clk: rockchip: disable init state before mmc card initialization Shawn Lin
2015-08-24 10:01 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2015-08-24 14:02   ` Shawn Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=120036049.vlT25D4un8@phil \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox