From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: Are Section mismatches out of control?
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:21:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1201864894.23523.117.camel@brick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080201030329.9b760777.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 03:03 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:47:18 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>
> > James said in a related posting that the Section mismatch
> > warnings were getting out of control.
>
> eh. They're easy - the build system tells you about them!
>
> > The list is here:
>
> Question is: why do people keep adding new ones when they are so easy to
> detect and fix?
>
> Asnwer: because neither they nor their patch integrators are doing adequate
> compilation testing.
Because if there already exists more than a handful peoples' eyes glaze
over and ignore "just one more warning"
Unless they break the build, or if there currently are 0 and they make
it non-zero, people seem not to care....sad. Probably the same for
sparse/checkpatch, "there's plenty already, I can't be bothered to look"
Subject to someone _making_ it an issue, can't see it changing.
Harvey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-01 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-01 10:47 Are Section mismatches out of control? Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-01 11:03 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-01 11:21 ` Harvey Harrison [this message]
2008-02-01 13:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-02-01 13:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-01 21:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-02-01 22:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-02 16:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-02-02 17:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-01 17:02 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-01 21:47 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-01 22:10 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-01 22:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-02 0:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-01 14:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-02-01 15:00 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-01 16:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-01 20:17 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-01 20:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-01 22:38 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-01 11:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-01 21:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-02 4:12 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-01 14:53 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1201864894.23523.117.camel@brick \
--to=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox