From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RT scheduler config, suggestions and questions
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:50:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1202334655.6274.4.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47A9F6BE.1010800@qualcomm.com>
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 10:04 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 07:36 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> >>> btw I can see "watchdog" being very useful to catch hard-RT tasks that exceed the deadline.
> >>> But's it gotta be per thread.
> >> It is.
> >>
> >>> Single setting per user is not enough. Unless a use has a single RT task.
> >> ?
> >
> > Ah, its starting to make sense, you want it configurable per thread, not
> > process wide. Yes, I see how that is useful, just no idea how to expose
> > that to user-space atm.
> Yes. That's what I meant. I don't think overall per process setting is that useful.
> Per thread though would be useful.
>
> How to expose that to the user-space ? The best option in my opinion is to extend
> struct sched_param. That way both sched_setparam() and pthread_attr_setschedparam()
> can be used to set new attributes and it's backwards compatible.
> Something like:
>
> struct sched_param {
> ...
> unsigned int sched_rt_limit;
> unsigned int sched_rt_...;
> };
I'm somewhat afraid to touch sched_param, but it seems I need to change
it anyway soonish, so I'd better figure out how to do that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-06 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-05 23:37 RT scheduler config, suggestions and questions Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-06 6:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-06 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-06 18:04 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-06 21:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-02-06 17:52 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1202334655.6274.4.camel@lappy \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox