linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:25:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1202862343.4974.44.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0802111155310.17652@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 11:56 -0800, David Rientjes wrote: 
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > > @@ -218,21 +167,27 @@ static struct mempolicy *mpol_new(enum mempolicy_mode mode,
> > >                 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > >         flags &= MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
> > >         atomic_set(&policy->refcnt, 1);
> > > +       cpuset_update_task_memory_state();
> > > +       nodes_and(cpuset_context_nmask, *nodes, cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
> > >         switch (mode) {
> > >         case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
> > > -               policy->v.nodes = *nodes;
> > > +               if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
> > > +                       return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > 
> > need kmem_cache_free(policy_cache, policy) before return?
> > 
> 
> Very good catch!
> 
> 
> 
> mempolicy: fix policy memory leak in mpol_new()
> 
> If mpol_new() cannot setup a new mempolicy because of an invalid argument
> provided by the user, avoid leaking the mempolicy that has been dynamically
> allocated.
> 
> Reported by KOSAKI Motohiro.
> 
> Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
>  mm/mempolicy.c |   10 +++++-----
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -171,13 +171,11 @@ static struct mempolicy *mpol_new(enum mempolicy_mode mode,
>  	nodes_and(cpuset_context_nmask, *nodes, cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
>  	switch (mode) {
>  	case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
> -		if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
> -			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> -		policy->v.nodes = cpuset_context_nmask;
> -		if (nodes_weight(policy->v.nodes) == 0) {
> +		if (nodes_empty(*nodes) || nodes_empty(cpuset_context_nmask)) {
>  			kmem_cache_free(policy_cache, policy);
>  			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  		}
> +		policy->v.nodes = cpuset_context_nmask;
>  		break;
>  	case MPOL_PREFERRED:
>  		policy->v.preferred_node = first_node(cpuset_context_nmask);
> @@ -185,8 +183,10 @@ static struct mempolicy *mpol_new(enum mempolicy_mode mode,
>  			policy->v.preferred_node = -1;
>  		break;
>  	case MPOL_BIND:
> -		if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
> +		if (nodes_empty(*nodes)) {
> +			kmem_cache_free(policy_cache, policy);
>  			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +		}
>  		policy->v.zonelist = bind_zonelist(&cpuset_context_nmask);
>  		if (IS_ERR(policy->v.zonelist)) {
>  			void *error_code = policy->v.zonelist;

With this patch, we now have 3 error paths from mpol_new that need to
free the mempolicy struct.  How about consolidating them with something
like this [uncompiled/untested]:

PATCH mempolicy - consolidate mpol_new() error paths

Use common error path in mpol_new() for errors that we discover
after allocation the new mempolicy structure.  Free the mempolicy
in the common error path.

Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>

 mm/mempolicy.c |   16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: Linux/mm/mempolicy.c
===================================================================
--- Linux.orig/mm/mempolicy.c	2008-02-12 15:18:12.000000000 -0700
+++ Linux/mm/mempolicy.c	2008-02-12 15:22:07.000000000 -0700
@@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ static struct mempolicy *mpol_new(enum m
 {
 	struct mempolicy *policy;
 	nodemask_t cpuset_context_nmask;
+	void *error_code = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
 	pr_debug("setting mode %d flags %d nodes[0] %lx\n",
 		 mode, flags, nodes ? nodes_addr(*nodes)[0] : -1);
@@ -172,8 +173,7 @@ static struct mempolicy *mpol_new(enum m
 	switch (mode) {
 	case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
 		if (nodes_empty(*nodes) || nodes_empty(cpuset_context_nmask)) {
-			kmem_cache_free(policy_cache, policy);
-			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+			goto free_mpol;
 		}
 		policy->v.nodes = cpuset_context_nmask;
 		break;
@@ -184,14 +184,12 @@ static struct mempolicy *mpol_new(enum m
 		break;
 	case MPOL_BIND:
 		if (nodes_empty(*nodes)) {
-			kmem_cache_free(policy_cache, policy);
-			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+			goto free_mpol;
 		}
 		policy->v.zonelist = bind_zonelist(&cpuset_context_nmask);
 		if (IS_ERR(policy->v.zonelist)) {
-			void *error_code = policy->v.zonelist;
-			kmem_cache_free(policy_cache, policy);
-			return error_code;
+			error_code = policy->v.zonelist;
+			goto free_mpol;
 		}
 		break;
 	default:
@@ -201,6 +199,10 @@ static struct mempolicy *mpol_new(enum m
 	policy->cpuset_mems_allowed = cpuset_mems_allowed(current);
 	policy->user_nodemask = *nodes;
 	return policy;
+
+free_mpol:
+	kmem_cache_free(policy_cache, policy);
+	return error_code;
 }
 
 static void gather_stats(struct page *, void *, int pte_dirty);



  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-13  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-11 15:30 [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum David Rientjes
2008-02-11 15:30 ` [patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags David Rientjes
2008-02-11 15:30   ` [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag David Rientjes
2008-02-11 15:30     ` [patch 4/4] mempolicy: update NUMA memory policy documentation David Rientjes
2008-02-11 16:10       ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-11 20:06         ` [patch 4/4 v2] " David Rientjes
2008-02-11 20:14           ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-11 18:25     ` [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-11 19:56       ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13  0:25         ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2008-02-13  0:57           ` David Rientjes
2008-02-11 19:34     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13  0:22     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13  3:52       ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13  4:03         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13  4:13           ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13  4:23             ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13  8:03               ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13  9:36                 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 16:01                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13 18:48                     ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 18:58                       ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13 19:05                       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13 19:17                         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 17:04                   ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13 19:02                     ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 20:29                       ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13 21:35                         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-14 11:12                           ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-14 12:27                           ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-14 10:26                         ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-14 19:45                           ` David Rientjes
2008-02-15 10:19                             ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-15 20:14                               ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13  4:18       ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13  5:06         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13 15:15           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13 16:14         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13 19:12           ` David Rientjes
2008-02-14 10:09     ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-14 19:40       ` David Rientjes
2008-02-15  1:44         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-15 10:00           ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-14 21:38       ` David Rientjes
2008-02-15  9:27         ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-15 20:23           ` David Rientjes
2008-02-15 20:32             ` David Rientjes
2008-02-15 23:45             ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-15 23:55               ` David Rientjes
2008-02-16  0:11                 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-11 16:36   ` [patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-11 19:34     ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12 15:31       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12 19:14         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-11 20:55     ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-11 21:52       ` David Rientjes
2008-02-11 21:57         ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13  0:14   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13  0:25     ` David Rientjes
2008-02-11 18:45 ` [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum Andi Kleen
2008-02-11 19:25   ` David Rientjes
2008-02-11 19:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-11 19:40   ` David Rientjes
2008-02-11 19:48     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-11 20:02       ` David Rientjes
2008-02-11 20:45         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13  0:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-13  0:31   ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13  0:53     ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13  1:04     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13  1:28       ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13  1:32       ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13  2:00         ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13  2:22           ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13  2:42             ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13  2:59               ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-13  3:17                 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-13  3:22                   ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1202862343.4974.44.camel@localhost \
    --to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).