From: ian <spyro@f2s.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED v3][PATCH 1/7] regulator: consumer interface
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:26:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1205364361.24230.4.camel@wirenth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803121452.47600.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 13:52 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > I don't see a particular problem fitting this into the structure of
> > the current API - to me the switches inflexible regulators with no
> > configurable voltage control of their own.
>
> To me, they aren't regulators at all. :)
I dunno.
Regulate - to control.
A switch certainly controls voltage. Admittedly the granularity is a
little coarser than a nice digitally controlled regulator, but it fits
the model...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-12 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-06 18:10 [UPDATED v3][PATCH 1/7] regulator: consumer interface Liam Girdwood
2008-03-08 3:43 ` David Brownell
2008-03-09 11:10 ` Liam Girdwood
2008-03-11 0:39 ` David Brownell
2008-03-11 10:20 ` Liam Girdwood
2008-03-11 21:36 ` David Brownell
2008-03-11 22:25 ` David Brownell
2008-03-12 0:00 ` Mark Brown
2008-03-12 7:31 ` David Brownell
2008-03-12 13:02 ` Mark Brown
2008-03-12 21:52 ` David Brownell
2008-03-12 23:26 ` ian [this message]
2008-03-13 4:39 ` David Brownell
2008-03-12 23:57 ` Mark Brown
2008-03-13 5:08 ` David Brownell
2008-03-13 12:00 ` Mark Brown
2008-03-11 2:00 ` David Brownell
2008-03-11 15:19 ` Liam Girdwood
2008-03-12 6:29 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1205364361.24230.4.camel@wirenth \
--to=spyro@f2s.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox