From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Frank Munzert <frankm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: lock held when returning to user space
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:43:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1205423029.10894.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803122236030.7266@twin.jikos.cz>
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 22:40 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> No, as it is a real bug if you use mutexes in this way. What happens if
> process that has called open() on your device (and has not closed it yet)
> calls fork()?
> Another breakage scenario -- what if the filedescriptor is sent through
> unix socket to another process? etc.
There's a number of places where a semaphore is used across system
calls.
for instance the usb skeleton,
drivers/usb/usb-skeleton.c
Several of the watchdog drivers,
drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
These need to be removed, but the usage is clearly not compatible with
the mutex API ..
If you convert them to atomic counts then you loose the sleeping aspect
of the semaphore, which you'd have to add back somehow.
The only API that seems straight forward is using complete's .. Then you
get an atomic count and all the sleeping function calls you might want..
(include/linux/completion.h) The problem with complete's is that you
can't start them out at "1" or "completed" unless you actually run
complete() once during initialization (that's kind of ugly) ..
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-13 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 15:45 BUG: lock held when returning to user space Frank Munzert
2008-03-12 16:29 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-03-12 21:40 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-03-13 15:43 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2008-03-13 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-13 17:56 ` Daniel Walker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-13 16:49 J.C. Pizarro
2007-10-27 14:19 Gabriel C
2007-10-27 15:12 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-10-27 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-27 15:46 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-28 11:12 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-10-29 12:20 ` Alessandro Zummo
2007-10-27 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-27 22:47 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-10-27 15:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-27 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-27 17:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1205423029.10894.75.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=frankm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox