From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: zippel@linux-m68k.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] Remove current_tick_length()
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:41:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1205548860.6122.55.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080314195737.153531685@linux-m68k.org>
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 19:40 +0100, zippel@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> plain text document attachment (tick_length)
> current_tick_length used to do a little more, but now it just returns
> tick_length, which we can also access directly at the few places, where
> it's needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Hrm. I'm not sure I like using a global variable instead of using an
accessor function. At least with the accessor function folks couldn't
just tweak the value outside ntp as easily.
Is there any additional rational for this change?
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-15 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-14 18:40 [PATCH 0/8] NTP updates zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/8] cleanup ntp.c zippel
2008-03-14 20:30 ` john stultz
2008-03-15 3:21 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/8] NTP4 user space bits update zippel
2008-03-14 20:36 ` john stultz
2008-03-15 3:29 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 3/8] increase time_freq resolution zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 4/8] increase time_offset resolution zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5/8] support for TAI zippel
2008-03-14 20:55 ` john stultz
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 6/8] Rename TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT to NTP_SCALE_SHIFT zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 7/8] Remove current_tick_length() zippel
2008-03-15 2:41 ` john stultz [this message]
2008-03-15 3:32 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-15 3:48 ` john stultz
2008-03-15 4:18 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-15 16:29 ` Ray Lee
2008-03-15 17:14 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-18 1:01 ` john stultz
2008-03-26 1:53 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 8/8] handle leap second via timer zippel
2008-03-14 20:24 ` john stultz
2008-03-15 3:18 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-17 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-21 14:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-14 23:03 ` [PATCH 0/8] NTP updates john stultz
2008-03-15 3:15 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1205548860.6122.55.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox