public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: posix-cpu-timers revamp
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:24:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1206995072.14649.41.camel@bobble.smo.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080331054404.78CDB26F8E9@magilla.localdomain>

Roland, I'm very much having to read between the lines of what you've
written.  And, obviously, getting it wrong at least half the time. :-)

So you've cleared part of my understanding with your latest email.
Here's what I've gotten from it:

        struct task_cputime {
        	cputime_t utime;		/* User time. */
        	cputime_t stime;		/* System time. */
        	unsigned long long sched_runtime; /* Scheduler time. */
        };
        
This is for both SMP and UP, defined before signal_struct in sched.h
(since that structure refers to this one).  Following that:

        struct thread_group_cputime;

Which is a forward reference to the real definition later in the file.
The inline functions depend on signal_struct and task_struct, so they
have to come after:

        #ifdef SMP

        struct thread_group_cputime {
        	struct task_cputime *totals;
        };

        < ... inline functions ... >

        #else /* SMP */

        struct thread_group_cputime {
        	struct task_cputime totals;
        };

        < ... inline functions ... >

        #endif

The SMP version is percpu, the UP version is just a substructure.  In
signal_struct itself, delete utime & stime, add
        struct thread_group_cputime cputime;

The inline functions include the ones you defined for UP plus equivalent
ones for SMP.  The SMP inlines check the percpu pointer
(sig->cputime.totals) and don't update if it's NULL.  One small
correction to one of your inlines, in thread_group_cputime:
                *cputime = sig->cputime;
should be
                *cputime = sig->cputime.totals;

A representative inline for SMP is:

        static inline void account_group_system_time(struct task_struct *task,
        					      cputime_t cputime)
        {
        	struct task_cputime *times;
        
        	if (!sig->cputime.totals)
        		return;
        	times = per_cpu_ptr(sig->cputime.totals, get_cpu());
        	times->stime = cputime_add(times->stime, cputime);
        	put_cpu_no_resched();
        }
        
To deal with the need for bookkeeping with multiple threads in the SMP
case (where there isn't a per-cpu structure until it's needed), I'll
allocate the per-cpu structure in __exit_signal() where the relevant
fields are updated.  I'll also allocate it where I do now, in
do_setitimer(), when needed.  The allocation will be a "return 0" for UP
and a call to "thread_group_times_alloc_smp()" (which lives in sched.c)
for SMP.

I'll also optimize run_posix_cpu_timers() as you suggest, and eliminate
rlim_expires.

Expect a new patch fairly soon.
-- 
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>
Google, Inc.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-31 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-9906-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-02-07  0:50 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 9906] New: Weird hang with NPTL and SIGPROF Andrew Morton
2008-02-07  0:58   ` Frank Mayhar
2008-02-07  2:57     ` Parag Warudkar
2008-02-07 15:22       ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2008-02-07 15:53         ` Parag Warudkar
2008-02-07 15:56           ` Parag Warudkar
2008-02-07 15:54             ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2008-02-07 16:01               ` Parag Warudkar
2008-02-07 16:53                 ` Parag Warudkar
2008-02-29 19:55                   ` Frank Mayhar
2008-03-04  7:00                     ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-04 19:52                       ` Frank Mayhar
2008-03-05  4:08                         ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-06 19:04                           ` Frank Mayhar
2008-03-11  7:50                             ` posix-cpu-timers revamp Roland McGrath
2008-03-11 21:05                               ` Frank Mayhar
2008-03-11 21:35                                 ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-14  0:37                                   ` Frank Mayhar
2008-03-21  7:18                                     ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-21 17:57                                       ` Frank Mayhar
2008-03-22 21:58                                         ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-24 17:34                                           ` Frank Mayhar
2008-03-24 22:43                                             ` Frank Mayhar
2008-03-31  5:44                                             ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-31 20:24                                               ` Frank Mayhar [this message]
2008-04-02  2:07                                                 ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-02 16:34                                                   ` Frank Mayhar
2008-04-02 17:42                                                   ` Frank Mayhar
2008-04-02 19:48                                                     ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-02 20:34                                                       ` Frank Mayhar
2008-04-02 21:42                                                         ` Frank Mayhar
2008-04-04  0:53                                                           ` Frank Mayhar
2008-04-04 23:17                                                         ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-06  5:26                                                           ` Frank Mayhar
2008-04-07 20:08                                                             ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-07 21:31                                                               ` Frank Mayhar
2008-04-07 22:02                                                                 ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-08 21:27                                                               ` Frank Mayhar
2008-04-08 21:52                                                                 ` Frank Mayhar
2008-04-08 22:49                                                                 ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-09 16:29                                                                   ` Frank Mayhar
2008-04-02 18:42                                                   ` Frank Mayhar
2008-03-28  0:52                                           ` [PATCH 2.6.25-rc6] Fix itimer/many thread hang Frank Mayhar
2008-03-28 10:28                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 22:46                                             ` [PATCH 2.6.25-rc7 resubmit] " Frank Mayhar
2008-04-01 18:45                                               ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-01 21:46                                                 ` Frank Mayhar
2008-03-21 20:40                                       ` posix-cpu-timers revamp Frank Mayhar
2008-03-07 23:26                           ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 9906] New: Weird hang with NPTL and SIGPROF Frank Mayhar
2008-03-08  0:01                             ` Frank Mayhar
2008-02-07 17:36           ` Frank Mayhar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1206995072.14649.41.camel@bobble.smo.corp.google.com \
    --to=fmayhar@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox