public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:58:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207162685.23161.217.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080402182128.GA15403@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 14:21 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 07:07:24PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 14:47 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > echo "add file.c" > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_printk/files
> > > > echo "remove file.c" > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_printk/files
> > I think this would be better by module rather than filename.
> > KBUILD_MODNAME would be a better choice.
> agreed. i think 'KBUILD_MODNAME" provides a better interface. The original
> implementation was using complete source pathnames, so they were unique. Are
> 'KBUILD_MODNAME's unique?

Yes, not by file, but by groups of compilation units
that make up a module.  I think that's more sensible anyway.

I also have patches to pr_<level> that allow for dynamic
prefixing of KBUILD_MODNAME, __FUNCTION__, and __LINE__ 
that might be a useful addition to a facility such as yours.

These patches also make the kernel smaller by removing the
direct uses of __FILE__/__FUNCTION__/__func__ from pr_<level>.

I intend to post them during the next merge window.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-02 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-01 19:49 [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure Jason Baron
2008-04-01 20:09 ` mws
2008-04-01 21:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-02  2:07   ` Joe Perches
2008-04-02 18:21     ` Jason Baron
2008-04-02 18:58       ` Joe Perches [this message]
2008-04-04 18:13         ` Jason Baron
2008-04-04 18:33           ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1207162685.23161.217.camel@localhost \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox