From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751742AbYDEGvo (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Apr 2008 02:51:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751116AbYDEGve (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Apr 2008 02:51:34 -0400 Received: from nn7.de ([85.214.94.156]:56024 "EHLO nn7.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751059AbYDEGvd (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Apr 2008 02:51:33 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.25 intended change: smc:kbd_backlight vs. smc::kbd_backlight ? From: Soeren Sonnenburg To: Justin Mattock Cc: rpurdie@rpsys.net, Julien BLACHE , Linux Kernel , "Rafael J\. Wysocki" In-Reply-To: References: <1207162690.9669.11.camel@localhost> <1207292068.4511.10.camel@localhost> <1207373556.10237.2.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:51:30 +0200 Message-Id: <1207378290.10237.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 06:44 +0000, Justin Mattock wrote: > Hello; there must be some kind of reason for the change from ":" to > "::" smc::kbd_backlight, maybee something with the kernel spitting > out: > > [ 464.524630] applesmc: wait status failed: 5 != 4 [...] > I'm tired of seeing this, how to get rid of this regression if you > want to call this that.? > regards; The '::' is only a cosmetic thing and won't give you these messages. Anyway I am getting them too (but very very rarely) - but it is a completely different issue. Soeren