linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
To: "dean gaudet" <dean@arctic.org>
Cc: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@mailshack.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: generic versions of find_first_(zero_)bit, convert     i386
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:25:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207563950.7880.1246457209@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0804061320470.7751@twinlark.arctic.org>


On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:22:58 -0700 (PDT), "dean gaudet" <dean@arctic.org>
said:
> On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> 
> > The current generic implementation of ffz is O(lg(n)) already
> 
> it's O(lg(n)) time... the operations all depend on each other.
> 
> the implementation i pointed to is O(lg(n)) code space... and the time 
> depends on how parallel the machine is, they're not dependent on each 
> other.

Indeed. The worst dependencies are in the sum of all the partial
results in this implementation. And addition is associative, so
partial results can be written as ((a+b)+(c+d))+(e+f). Assuming
perfect parallel execution this would lead to O(ln(ln(n))). Good.

Care to implement ffs and __ffs like this?

Greetings,
    Alexander

> -dean
-- 
  Alexander van Heukelum
  heukelum@fastmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-07 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-31 17:15 [PATCH] x86: generic versions of find_first_(zero_)bit, convert i386 Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-31 17:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-03-31 19:38   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-31 21:58     ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-01  8:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-01  9:46   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-01 15:41     ` [PATCH] x86: switch x86_64 to generic find_first_bit Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-01 15:42       ` [PATCH] x86: optimize find_first_bit for small bitmaps Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-01 15:47         ` [PATCH] x86: remove x86-specific implementations of find_first_bit Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-03  9:34           ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-04  8:47           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-06 17:03     ` [PATCH] x86: generic versions of find_first_(zero_)bit, convert i386 dean gaudet
2008-04-06 18:51       ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-06 20:22         ` dean gaudet
2008-04-07  8:43           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-07 10:25           ` Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2008-04-18 20:18             ` Alternative implementation of the generic __ffs Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-18 23:46               ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19  0:09                 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-04-19  0:20                   ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19  0:58                     ` Joe Perches
2008-04-19  1:04                       ` Harvey Harrison
2008-04-19  1:11                         ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19  2:55                           ` Joe Perches
2008-04-19  4:13                             ` dean gaudet
2008-04-19 10:05                               ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-04-19 12:10                               ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-19 18:17                                 ` Joe Perches
2008-04-19 20:26                                   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-19 22:29                             ` Matti Aarnio
2008-04-20  3:06                               ` Joe Perches
2008-04-20  8:42                                 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-20 12:31                                   ` Matti Aarnio
2008-04-21 11:43                                     ` Alexander van Heukelum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1207563950.7880.1246457209@webmail.messagingengine.com \
    --to=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dean@arctic.org \
    --cc=heukelum@mailshack.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).