From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [NFS] Increase size of struct fid raw buffer
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:50:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207641005.3635.238.camel@quoit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0804070850310.11277@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 08:54 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> >
> > GFS2 requires the NFS filehandle buffer to be larger than the
> > minimum size as per the bug report: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/24/374
> > Its a pretty trivial fix for now and I've done a test which shows
> > that it works ok.
>
> I'm not seeing the point of this.
>
> Every single instance of "struct fid" that I saw in a quick grep was
> created not as a "struct fid", but as some other data structure that was
> then cast to a "struct fid *".
>
> So the _underlying_ size of "struct fid" seems to be pretty random, and
> totally unrelated to this declaration.
>
> But admittedly that really was just a quick grep, and maybe I missed
> something. But it seems like this patch doesn't really change anything,
> just largely makes a change in a structure that is apparently used as an
> opaque pointer.
>
> Is there anything that actually uses "struct fid" as an _allocation_
> entity?
>
> And if not, then that "_u32 raw[6]" should probably be a un-sized "_u32
> raw[]" instead, no?
>
> Linus
I'm happy with that solution, although I'd assumed that the reason this
field had a size in the first place was that the NFS people had a plan
to use the structure as an allocation entity in the future. Can an NFS
developer please confirm/deny this?
If everybody is happy with the plan, then I'll send a patch to make the
change as you suggest shortly,
Steve.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-08 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-07 9:47 [NFS] Increase size of struct fid raw buffer Steven Whitehouse
2008-04-07 15:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-08 7:50 ` Steven Whitehouse [this message]
2008-04-08 7:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-08 9:57 ` Steven Whitehouse
2008-04-08 13:01 ` [NFS] Use a zero sized array for raw field in struct fid Steven Whitehouse
2008-04-09 16:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1207641005.3635.238.camel@quoit \
--to=swhiteho@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox