From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hugetlbfs: architecture header cleanup
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:35:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207740955.878.5.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080407205906.25bd06c6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 20:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Seem that git-s390 is currently carrying the old versions of these patches.
>
> I'll drop git-s390. Which will presumably kick off a cascade of droppages
> due to git-s390 versus git-kvm damage control. All of which will need to
> be undropped in some fashion when those trees come to their senses. Ho
> hum.
Yes, git-s390 wasn't updated for a few days. I've dropped all the
hugetlbfs patches since the version we will push upstream depends on the
cleanup which will go in over -mm. I keep the fingers crossed that the
git-s390 now works again.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-09 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 16:45 [PATCH 0/3] hugetlbfs: cleanup and new primitives for s390, v3 Gerald Schaefer
2008-04-04 16:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] hugetlbfs: architecture header cleanup Gerald Schaefer
2008-04-08 3:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-09 11:35 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2008-04-04 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] hugetlbfs: add missing TLB flush to hugetlb_cow() Gerald Schaefer
2008-04-04 17:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] hugetlbfs: common code update for s390 Gerald Schaefer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-02 14:17 [PATCH 0/3] hugetlbfs: cleanup and new primitives " Gerald Schaefer
2008-04-02 14:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] hugetlbfs: architecture header cleanup Gerald Schaefer
2008-04-02 17:42 ` Dave Hansen
2008-04-02 19:07 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-04-03 21:43 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1207740955.878.5.camel@localhost \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox