From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758825AbYDKMLu (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:11:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752663AbYDKMLk (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:11:40 -0400 Received: from nn7.de ([85.214.94.156]:35819 "EHLO nn7.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751915AbYDKMLk (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:11:40 -0400 Subject: Re: suspend issue From: Soeren Sonnenburg To: Pavel Machek Cc: Justin Mattock , Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <20080411105712.GC18770@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1207490104.4597.36.camel@localhost> <20080406232849.GA789@elf.ucw.cz> <1207736730.4320.1.camel@localhost> <20080410100234.GB11084@ucw.cz> <1207865152.21472.2.camel@localhost> <20080411105712.GC18770@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:11:29 +0200 Message-Id: <1207915890.4526.32.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:57 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Fri 2008-04-11 00:05:52, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: [...] > > > Well, 2.6.20 worked, so bisect should be easy, right? > > > > I don't quite understand... 2.6.24 worked yes, but 2.6.25-rc1 didn't > > even *suspend*. However the problem lies not in suspending but no > > display on *resume*. So the bug is hidden by the hang on suspend and I > > don't see how I can check when resume broke. > > Hmm, you could bisect the resume regression, revert that, and then go > on to find the suspend regression. > > ...ok, not easy, I see. > > Do you have kernel.org bugzilla # I could look at? Perhaps this can be > debugged using printks or something... http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10319 Soeren