From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754287AbYDXH7O (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:59:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751134AbYDXH66 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:58:58 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:8102 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751266AbYDXH65 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:58:57 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,703,1199692800"; d="scan'208";a="274154883" Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI Express ASPM support should default to 'No' From: Shaohua Li To: Andi Kleen Cc: Jesse Barnes , Jesper Juhl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <87abjjzo84.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <200804221712.45972.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> <1208912721.31625.3.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> <87abjjzo84.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:02:06 +0800 Message-Id: <1209024126.7479.0.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:49 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Shaohua Li writes: > > > On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 17:12 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> On Tuesday, April 22, 2008 3:28 pm Jesper Juhl wrote: > >> > Running 'make oldconfig' I just noticed that PCIEASPM defaults to > >> > 'y' in Kconfig even though the feature is both experimental and the > >> > help text recommends that if you are unsure you say 'n'. > >> > It seems to me that this really should default to 'n', not 'y' at the > >> > moment. > >> > The following patch makes that change. Please consider applying. > >> > >> Seem reasonable, Shaohua? Please cc linux-pci on PCI patches > >> though... > > Ok, I'm fine with the patch. Though by default, the policy is to use > > BIOS setting, that is if BIOS disables ASPM, we don't enable it too. > > Once the feature is considered stable it would be nice to make it > default y > again. I think any power saving should be on by default (unless > serious > issues are known), not off. yes, we could do it in next release. Thanks, Shaohua