public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Justin Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] idle (arch, acpi and apm) and lockdep
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:19:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1209147590.1956.12.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd18b0c30804251108q2d55736dtd4807db2a9ffb6c5@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 18:08 +0000, Justin Mattock wrote:
> O.K. I applied this patch, below are the results:

> patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 111.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 126.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 183.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 194.
> 4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c.rej
> patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 106.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 179.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c.rej
> patching file drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 418.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 519.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 535.
> 3 out of 3 FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c.rej
> pathing file arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 904.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 912.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c.rej
> patching file include/asm/asm-x86/processor.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 723.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILE -- saving rejects to file include/asm-x86/processor.h.rej
> patching file arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 44 with fuzz 2.
> 
> When I compile the kernel I'm receiving this.
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/process.o: In function `select_idle_routine':
> process.c:(.cpuinit.text+0x0): multiple definition of `select_idle_routine'
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.o:process_32.c(.cpuinit.text+0x0: first defined here
> arch/x86/kernel/process.o: In function `cpu_idle_wait':
> process.c:(text+0x16): multiple definition of `cpu_idle_wait'
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.o:process_32.c:(.text0x432): first defined here
> arch/x86/kernel/process.o: In function `mwait_idle_with_hints':
> process.c:(.text+0x113): multiple definition of 'mwait_idle_with_hints'
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.o:process_32.c:(.text+0x1db): first defined here
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
> 
> 
> Should I just go ahead and try git-pull to see if these patches are
> applied over there correctly.
> regards;

That's no good :-/

weird, I have:

# git describe
v2.6.25-4569-gb69d398

# quilt push
Applying patch patches/idle-lockdep-1.patch
patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
patching file arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
patching file drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
patching file arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
patching file include/asm-x86/processor.h
patching file arch/x86/kernel/process.c

Now at patch patches/idle-lockdep-1.patch


And I did a i386 and x86_64 defconfig build before I send it out.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-25 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-25  0:24 [ INFO: iconsistent lock state ] Justin Mattock
2008-04-25 12:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-25 14:47   ` Justin Mattock
2008-04-25 14:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-25 15:39       ` [PATCH] idle (arch, acpi and apm) and lockdep Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-25 18:08         ` Justin Mattock
2008-04-25 18:19           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-04-25 19:18             ` Justin Mattock
2008-04-25 22:05               ` Justin Mattock
2008-04-25 15:45       ` [ INFO: iconsistent lock state ] Justin Mattock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1209147590.1956.12.camel@lappy \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=justinmattock@gmail.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox