From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765549AbYDYTt0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:49:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757266AbYDYTtQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:49:16 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182]:35144 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755677AbYDYTtP (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:49:15 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=EN9xhUJHucNzIA1OaEryIpyFOyKwVqsm1H+zFQNlHDVP5F6qdeOYWYe8mHlEq2fTq5JiMV80wpX87pUwxeHdvhobLTHfM2mvGyTGThtTNXuk0USKFVylA1gaqeAyRfelI9OmSKH04ZRrwWP35TVHQOT4KeBuYeLnGWh8Eb9rX+0= Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] types: create From: Harvey Harrison To: Linus Torvalds , Al Viro Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Matthew Wilcox , Jan Engelhardt , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Arch Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <1209078352-7593-1-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com> <1209078352-7593-2-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com> <1209078352-7593-3-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com> <20080425185251.GL14990@parisc-linux.org> <48122CB0.7020003@zytor.com> <20080425192858.GM14990@parisc-linux.org> <48123325.30003@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:49:16 -0700 Message-Id: <1209152956.14173.2.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 12:45 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > > I have to admit to liking the Windows extension %I64u for this kind of stuff. > > Unfortunately gcc/glibc decided to use I for internationalized digits instead > > :( > > The sad part is that this is purely a gcc thing. We could easily do the > right thing in the kernel vsnprintf stuff, but then we'd have to drop the > nice format warnings from gcc ;( This looks like something sparse could be made to check though, should we lose the gcc checking. In fact, didn't Al Viro mention adding just this kind of checking to sparse recently? Harvey