From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763765AbYD2VDN (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:03:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754087AbYD2VC5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:02:57 -0400 Received: from el-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.162.181]:57652 "EHLO el-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753242AbYD2VC4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:02:56 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=i9GcI8Wf9V1IvkEYLnjjHrd6ImFbT08UpyHDlVbOL85XF8u2w/YeCOBdtrKXE/yeTIKrH27iXG5dFAiLUZeXAwaERydo1FGg5r6ysAUkHq9unkGZZy4iYgdhAC9nAYk4NgCb2ZYvFCSwNywDWmHnybpYhAwd1CoPdfCkT1JbMNA= Subject: Re: pcmcia_ioctl.c compile error From: Harvey Harrison To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Russell King , Adrian Bunk , "Denis V. Lunev" , Andrew Morton , linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, Alexey Dobriyan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080429135902.504b6362.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20080429182709.GB2898@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080429201704.GA31311@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20080429135902.504b6362.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:03:07 -0700 Message-Id: <1209502988.24729.31.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 13:59 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:17:04 +0100 Russell King wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:27:10PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Commit 9c37066d888bf6e1b96ad12304971b3ddeabbad0 (proc: remove proc_bus) > > > came through -mm that contains a patch implementing the overdue removal > > > of the PCMCIA control ioctl that did not yet make it into Linus' tree: > > > > Okay, this means at least one of my platforms is now dead as far as > > building new kernels for it, and nothing I can do about that. Ho hum. > > I don't get it. Several of us had building problems for a few > days with some pasic driver. We posted some bug reports and > some patches, but we put up with it for a few days... > I believe Russell is referring to the removal of the ioctl, not the compile breakage. Harvey