From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@thebigcorporation.com>,
Remy Bohmer <linux@bohmer.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Preempt-RT patch for 2.6.25
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 09:31:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1210005073.17132.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0805051220590.25250@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 12:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2008, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > You really want bisection first. The reason is that you don't want ever
> > growing patches, you want smaller and smaller patches. For instance the
> > rt-mutex-core.patch is way too large, you wouldn't want to fold my
> > PICK_FUNCTION changes into that patch since that would just make
> > rt-mutex-core larger ..
> >
>
> Yeah, I already did that ;-)
You already folded my PICK_FUNCTION changes? That's why I mentioned it.
Daniel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-05 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-02 18:02 Preempt-RT patch for 2.6.25 Remy Bohmer
2008-05-02 18:34 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-05-02 18:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-02 18:54 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-05-02 19:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-02 19:14 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-05-03 2:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 14:21 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:01 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 16:19 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 17:04 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 18:58 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 21:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-05 22:12 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 23:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-06 0:11 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 1:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-06 1:43 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 8:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-06 16:01 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 0:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-06 1:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-06 2:10 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 8:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-06 10:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-06 16:05 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 16:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-06 17:06 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-06 20:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 16:17 ` Daniel Walker
2008-05-05 16:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-05-05 16:31 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1210005073.17132.16.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@bohmer.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sven@thebigcorporation.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox