From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
toralf.foerster@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Subject: Re: build issue #380 for v2.6.26-rc1-279-g28a4acb : mach-voyager: multiple definition of `phys_cpu_present_map'
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 09:01:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1210428108.4002.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080510131752.GA888@elte.hu>
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 15:17 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > > I already told you that this was incorrect. This is what I sent as
> > > the replacement on 28 April and I didn't hear back from you.
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120941111400620
> >
> > ok - picked it up for testing - could you please send a signoff line
> > as well?
>
> Alexey, the patch from James failed in testing on visws:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `init_apic_mappings':
> : undefined reference to `boot_cpu_physical_apicid'
> arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `init_apic_mappings':
> : undefined reference to `boot_cpu_physical_apicid'
> arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `APIC_init_uniprocessor':
> : undefined reference to `boot_cpu_physical_apicid'
> arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `APIC_init_uniprocessor':
>
> config is at:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Sat_May_10_15_05_47_CEST_2008.bad
OK, so these symbols are required on visws as well. So that makes the
gating config symbol X86_LOCAL_APIC.
Could you run this through the same config to verify; thanks!
James
---
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: [VOYAGER] fix duplicate phys_cpu_present_map symbol
The phys_cpu_present_map is an expected symbol in the SMP harness.
Unfortunately, x86 recently moved this and a few others to
kernel/setup.c where it doesn't quite work because voyager has to
define its own. Use CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC to isolate these
definitions and fix up another area in setup.c where CONFIG_X86_SMP
should be used instead of CONFIG_SMP.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index cc6f5eb..3f1f642 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <asm/mpspec.h>
#include <asm/apicdef.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
unsigned int num_processors;
unsigned disabled_cpus __cpuinitdata;
/* Processor that is doing the boot up */
@@ -23,8 +24,9 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(x86_cpu_to_apicid);
/* Bitmask of physically existing CPUs */
physid_mask_t phys_cpu_present_map;
+#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
+#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA) && defined(CONFIG_X86_SMP)
/*
* Copy data used in early init routines from the initial arrays to the
* per cpu data areas. These arrays then become expendable and the
--
1.5.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-10 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-09 9:13 build issue #380 for v2.6.26-rc1-279-g28a4acb : mach-voyager: multiple definition of `phys_cpu_present_map' Toralf Förster
2008-05-09 9:30 ` WANG Cong
2008-05-09 9:58 ` Toralf Förster
2008-05-09 10:16 ` WANG Cong
2008-05-09 9:52 ` WANG Cong
2008-05-09 9:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 10:09 ` WANG Cong
2008-05-09 10:59 ` Toralf Förster
2008-05-09 11:22 ` WANG Cong
2008-05-09 14:22 ` James Bottomley
2008-05-09 14:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 15:01 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-05-10 13:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-10 14:01 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-05-10 14:21 ` James Bottomley
2008-05-10 14:34 ` WANG Cong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1210428108.4002.5.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox