From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
To: "Nickolay Vinogradov" <nickolay@protei.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Russell King" <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 15:24:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1210685053.13437.1252892061@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48298990.7040705@protei.ru>
On Tue, 13 May 2008 16:29:04 +0400, "Nickolay Vinogradov"
<nickolay@protei.ru> said:
> Alexander van Heukelum пишет:
>
> > Hi Nickolay,
> >
> > The change is ok, I guess, but the cast should be a no-op (fls
> > takes an int, which is always 32 bit in linux). What is the problem
> > you are seeing? Does fls64() return a wrong value in some cases? If
> > so, what cpu? Which values?
> >
> > Why would this be a bug on big endian systems only? There is no
> > pointer magic involved, so the compiler should take care of the
> > casts in a correct way.
> >
> > Maybe you see a compiler warning? Which compiler version?
> >
> > (also note that current (development) kernels now have separate
> > versions for 32-bit and 64-bit environments.)
>
> Because fls() is a macro for asm-arm:
>
> #define fls(x) \
> ( __builtin_constant_p(x) ? constant_fls(x) : \
> ({ int __r; asm("clz\t%0, %1" : "=r"(__r) : "r"(x) : "cc");
> 32-__r; }) )
>
> We can fix it right here:
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h b/include/asm-arm/bitops.h
> index 5c60bfc..ce3fb6f 100644
> --- a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h
> +++ b/include/asm-arm/bitops.h
> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static inline int constant_fls(int x)
>
> #define fls(x) \
> ( __builtin_constant_p(x) ? constant_fls(x) : \
> - ({ int __r; asm("clz\t%0, %1" : "=r"(__r) : "r"(x) : "cc");
> 32-__r; }) )
> + ({ int __r; asm("clz\t%0, %1" : "=r"(__r) : "r"((__u32)x) :
> "cc"); 32-__r; }) )
> #define ffs(x) ({ unsigned long __t = (x); fls(__t & -__t); })
> #define __ffs(x) (ffs(x) - 1)
> #define ffz(x) __ffs( ~(x) )
Hmm, indeed.
Maybe: ({ int __r, __x = (x); asm("clz\t%0, %1" : "=r"(__r) : "r"(__x) :
"cc"); 32-__r; }) ?
This is a 32-bit machine, right? Doesn't the compiler complain about
feeding a long long into a 32-bit register?
Greetings,
Alexander
--
Alexander van Heukelum
heukelum@fastmail.fm
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - I mean, what is it about a decent email service?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-04 18:58 [PATCH] asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h Виноградов Николай Михайлович
2008-05-12 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-13 10:43 ` Nickolay Vinogradov
2008-05-13 15:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-13 15:45 ` Nickolay Vinogradov
2008-05-13 11:17 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-13 12:29 ` Nickolay Vinogradov
2008-05-13 13:24 ` Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2008-05-13 13:58 ` Russell King
2008-05-13 14:24 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-13 14:46 ` Nickolay Vinogradov
2008-05-13 14:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-05-13 16:11 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1210685053.13437.1252892061@webmail.messagingengine.com \
--to=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickolay@protei.ru \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox