public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Aneesh Kumar KV <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:12:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1210777967.10126.17.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080514134414.GA12693@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


> +#define GROUP_SCALE	(2*1024)
> +
>  static inline void inc_cpu_load(struct rq *rq, unsigned long load)
>  {
> +	load *= GROUP_SCALE;
>  	update_load_add(&rq->load, load);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void dec_cpu_load(struct rq *rq, unsigned long load)
>  {
> +	load *= GROUP_SCALE;
>  	update_load_sub(&rq->load, load);
>  }


Yeah, this bit makes a huge difference; I do that by:

mkdir /cgroup/foo
for i in `cat /cgroup/tasks`; do echo $i > /cgroup/foo/tasks; done
echo $((1024*1024)) > /cgroup/foo/cpu.shares

I'm still pulling my hairs out on why this makes a difference though - I
eliminated all direct assumption on SCHED_LOAD_SCALE(_FUZZ) with an
average of the weight per task. - but all that doesn't help (much)

A few other things I found that make a significant difference:



+static void update_aggregate(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
+{
+       aggregate_walk_tree(aggregate_get_down, aggregate_get_nop, cpu, sd);
+}


@@ -3224,6 +3189,8 @@ static int move_tasks(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, st
ruct rq *busiest,
        unsigned long total_load_moved = 0;
        int this_best_prio = this_rq->curr->prio;

+       update_aggregate(this_cpu, sd);
+
        do {
                total_load_moved +=
                        class->load_balance(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,



and

@@ -1169,7 +1168,10 @@ static unsigned long wakeup_gran(struct sched_entity *se)
         * More easily preempt - nice tasks, while not making it harder for
         * + nice tasks.
         */
-       gran = calc_delta_asym(sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity, se);
+       if (sched_feat(ASYM_GRAN))
+               gran = calc_delta_asym(sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity, se);
+       else
+               gran = calc_delta_fair(sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity, se);

        return gran;
 }


the asym logic is wrong wrt shares - it should look at tg->weight


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-14 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-06  2:06 volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1 Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-06  5:41 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-06 11:52 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-07 17:33   ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08  5:18     ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08  5:32       ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08  5:40       ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08  5:53         ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08  6:04           ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08  6:11           ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-09 15:52             ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-09 15:54               ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-12  1:39               ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12  2:04                 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-12  2:37                 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-12  3:33                   ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12  4:52                     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-12  5:02                       ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12  5:43                         ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12  9:04                         ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-12  9:20                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-14  9:22                             ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-14 13:44                             ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-14 14:50                               ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-14 15:12                               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-05-15  8:20                                 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-15  8:41                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-15 17:10                                     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-07  7:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07  9:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07  9:33   ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-07 17:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-07 18:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-08  6:07       ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08  5:20     ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08  5:34       ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08  6:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-07 17:42 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08  5:21   ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08  5:39     ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08  6:03       ` Zhang, Yanmin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1210777967.10126.17.camel@twins \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox