From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764203AbYESXG2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 19:06:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759438AbYESXGP (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 19:06:15 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]:59745 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761679AbYESXGN (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 19:06:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=nYveNgmnS67/r+X/JfquCgBDtz4lZ0MkY+xtklWBKmBwIC+hJeGeqeifOnKLRR+i4yw/ixiE+roo0YH0J50nnNWyhE5/Lw+oaWaliFqgsa5F1SZpLyJe5e/i0+Nk/QWg4iFhpRgdfZkR4+67UuOiA7PsvMssNIbjznt/GlY1/bs= Subject: Re: [2.6.27 patch] the scheduled smbfs removal From: Harvey Harrison To: Steven French Cc: Andrew Morton , Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 16:06:10 -0700 Message-Id: <1211238370.5915.96.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 18:03 -0500, Steven French wrote: > FYI - last week at connectathon I added one patch relating to backlevel > support and mapping of open flags on legacy smb open calls (although > perhaps some longtime smbfs users would not notice since smbfs did not > have this support either). > > The utimes support for backlevel servers is one obvious thing that I have > not added (but smbfs had some limited support for) but was considring > adding. > Just curious if there was a shortlist somewhere of anything supported in smbfs but not in cifs? Harvey