public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch/RFC]: check CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS for request/free_irq in interrupt.h
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:04:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1212080684.16984.30.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805291741.13956.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 17:41 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> I currently try to evaluate virtio_console for kvm on s390 and got
> the following problem:
> 
> virtio_console uses hvc_alloc with irq=0. That means, register_irq
> and free_irq are never called by hvc_console.c, but the linker will
> still complain about unknown references to free_irq and request_irq.
> 
> As the whole kernel/irq folder depends on CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS 
> it seems consistent to declare all functions from kernel/irq only if
> CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS is set. Otherwise we can use empty functions.
> 
> This patch does that for register_irq and free_irq. 
> 
> Comments?

Please don't. So far whenever the linker complained about the missing
register_irq/free_irq functions it has been a bug in a Kconfig file.
We should not silently accept code that requires the concept of an
irq-line when there is no such thing on a s390.

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.



  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-29 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-29 15:41 [Patch/RFC]: check CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS for request/free_irq in interrupt.h Christian Borntraeger
2008-05-29 17:04 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2008-05-29 18:32   ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-05-30  3:36     ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1212080684.16984.30.camel@localhost \
    --to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox