From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752411AbXCTLRE (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:17:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752615AbXCTLRD (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:17:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:57621 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752365AbXCTLRB (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:17:01 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20070319190306.44f9a2e5@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20070319190306.44f9a2e5@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070319152959.46a81e57@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070319130428.4b645207@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070318142315.6f881ec8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070316153408.3a9a244a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070316151305.04cbc352@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070316125008.3740.44693.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <25571.1174054993@redhat.com> <26525.1174058071@redhat.com> <20070316171141.7a4de504@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <076F1B35-BE08-41B4-8294-581EDAFF4ACC@mac.com> <2578.1174305403@redhat.com> <3728.1174309154@redhat.com> <25752.1174318898@redhat.com> To: Alan Cox Cc: Kyle Moffett , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert.xu@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, arjan@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #2] X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:16:45 +0000 Message-ID: <12125.1174389405@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > O> No, it's not. SOCK_DGRAM is an unreliable, unidirectional datagram passing > > service. > > Thats funny UDP receives and sends packets. I meant that the protocol ships a datagram from one peer to another, but there's no tie at the protocol level to any datagrams going the other way. David