From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, yhlu.kernel@gmail.com,
steiner@sgi.com, travis@sgi.com, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] x86 boot: remap efi systab runtime from phys to virt
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:27:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1213604828.12968.7.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080616030629.df7afc7a.pj@sgi.com>
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 03:06 -0500, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Huang wrote:
> > > efi.systab = (efi_system_table_t *) (unsigned long) systab;
> > > + efi.systab->runtime = __va(efi.systab->runtime);
> > > }
> > > }
> >
> > Why do you need this?
>
> I need this so that my kernel can callback into EFI runtime services
> post-boot.
>
>
> > This should be done by firmware in
> > efi_set_virtual_address_map().
>
> I don't understand this comment. I don't see any routine named
> 'efi_set_virtual_address_map()' in the kernel. I do see virt_*
> and phys_* variants of that name; did you mean one of those?
I mean the EFI runtime service SetVirtualAddressMap() in spec.
> In any case, I don't understand how this could "be done by firmware."
> It is the kernel that is mapping in the firmware somehow to support EFI
> runtime services.
This should be done in firmware. That is, the EFI system table:
efi.systab and runtime services table: efi.systab->runtime) will be
updated in SetVirtualAddressMap() by firmware. This is specified in
UEFI2.1 spec: Unified Extensible Firmware Interface Specification,
section 7.4 Virtual Memory Services. If the firmware does not do that
for you, please report bug to firmware vendor.
Your patch makes Linux kernel doesn't work on machine with proper
firmware, because the effect is like __va(__va(phys_ptr)).
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-16 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-16 6:29 [PATCH 1/8] x86 boot: x86_64 build reserve_bootmem_generic fix Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 6:29 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86 boot: e820 code indentation fix Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 6:29 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86 boot: x86_64 efi compiler warning fix Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 6:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86 boot: allow overlapping ebda and efi memmap memory ranges Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 6:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-16 7:32 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 7:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-16 8:31 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 7:07 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-16 8:24 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 8:53 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-16 9:09 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 9:14 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-16 15:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 16:38 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 17:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 17:37 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 17:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-16 18:09 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 18:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 18:53 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-16 19:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 17:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-16 18:05 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-17 1:00 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-16 6:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86 boot: remap efi systab runtime from phys to virt Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 7:02 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-16 8:06 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 8:27 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2008-06-16 8:26 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 6:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86 boot: virtualize the efi runtime function callback addresses Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 6:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86 boot: show pfn addresses in hex not decimal in some kernel info printks Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 7:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-16 8:09 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 6:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86 boot: more consistently use type int for node ids Paul Jackson
2008-06-16 6:50 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86 boot: x86_64 build reserve_bootmem_generic fix Yinghai Lu
2008-06-16 8:40 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1213604828.12968.7.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox