public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: bharathravi1@gmail.com
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@in.ibm.com, balbir@in.ibm.com,
	Madhava K R <madhavakr@gmail.com>,
	Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delay accounting, fix incorrect delay time when constantly waiting on runqueue
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:55:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1213610109.16944.95.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213609261-9554-1-git-send-email-bharathravi1@gmail.com>

On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 15:11 +0530, bharathravi1@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Bharath Ravi <bharathravi1@gmail.com>
> 
> This patch corrects the incorrect value of per process run-queue wait time
> reported by delay statistics. The anomaly was due to the following reason.
> When a process leaves the CPU and immediately starts waiting for CPU on
> the runqueue (which means it remains in the TASK_RUNNABLE state), the time
> of re-entry into the run-queue is never recorded. Due to this, the waiting time
> on the runqueue from this point of re-entry upto the next time it hits the CPU
> is not accounted for. This is solved by recording the time of re-entry of a
> process leaving the CPU in the sched_info_depart() function IF the process will
> go back to waiting on the run-queue. This IF condition is verified by checking
> whether the process is still in the TASK_RUNNABLE state.
> 
> The patch was tested on 2.6.26-rc6 using two simple CPU hog programs. The
> values noted prior to the fix did not account for the time spent on the
> runqueue waiting. After the fix, the correct values were reported back
> to user space.


Have you considered: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/5/10

I'm sad to say it is still pending in my todo list :-( - sorry Ankita.

> Signed-off-by: Bharath Ravi <bharathravi1@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Madhava K R  <madhavakr@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched_stats.h |    6 ++++++
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_stats.h b/kernel/sched_stats.h
> index a38878e..80179ef 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_stats.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched_stats.h
> @@ -198,6 +198,9 @@ static inline void sched_info_queued(struct task_struct *t)
>  /*
>   * Called when a process ceases being the active-running process, either
>   * voluntarily or involuntarily.  Now we can calculate how long we ran.
> + * Also, if the process is still in the TASK_RUNNING state, call
> + * sched_info_queued() to mark that it has now again started waiting on
> + * the runqueue.
>   */
>  static inline void sched_info_depart(struct task_struct *t)
>  {
> @@ -206,6 +209,9 @@ static inline void sched_info_depart(struct task_struct *t)
>  
>  	t->sched_info.cpu_time += delta;
>  	rq_sched_info_depart(task_rq(t), delta);
> +
> +	if (t->state == TASK_RUNNING)
> +		sched_info_queued(t);
>  }
>  
>  /*


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-16  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-16  9:41 [PATCH] Delay accounting, fix incorrect delay time when constantly waiting on runqueue bharathravi1
2008-06-16  9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-06-16 12:00   ` Madhava K R
2008-06-16 12:42     ` Ankita Garg
2008-06-16 16:34 ` Balbir Singh
2008-06-19 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 12:17   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1213610109.16944.95.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharathravi1@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madhavakr@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox