From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Daniel K." <dk@uw.no>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, menage@google.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG: NULL pointer dereference] cgroups and RT scheduling interact badly.
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:49:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1213692557.16944.153.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213629536.16944.109.camel@twins>
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 17:18 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 17:11 +0200, Daniel K. wrote:
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 15:51 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 15:14 +0200, Daniel K. wrote:
> > >>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Although this patch seems to be correct, this is what shows up on my
> > >>> netconsole, when applying it -- with an offset, do you have other fixes
> > >>> applied as well?
> > >> I had indeed, although nothing touching the rt scheduler. I popped all
> > >> my patches and pulled an update from Linus, but I fail to reproduce the
> > >> below.
> > >>
> > >> /me goes look for that burnp6 thing, I used a simple while (1); loop.
> > >
> > > found it, still seems to work for me. do you have a funny number of
> > > cpus? or anything else noteworthy?
> >
> > I don't think so, this is on a SUN X2200 M2, with two AMD Opteron 2214
> > processors, and 8G RAM.
> >
> > If I follow the procedure up to 'echo 4000 > oops/cpu.rt_runtime_us'
> > then I can
> >
> > # burnP6 &
> > [1] 3395
> > # schedtool -R -p 1 3395
> >
> > but
> >
> > # echo -n 3395 > /dev/cgroup/burn/oops/tasks
>
> Ah, that did it,.. I'll go poke at it. Thanks!
How's this work for you? (includes the previuos patchlet too)
---
Subject: sched: rt-group: fix NULL deref
- the rt group hierarchy got corrupted by always pointing the entity's
rq pointer to the root rq.
- the enqueue/dequeue on throttle should also use the full
dequeue_rt_stack like regular task enqueue/dequeue do. Not doing this
can leave empty groups and possibly corrupt the priority queues.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index eaf6751..efbb7d9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -7626,7 +7626,6 @@ static void init_tg_rt_entry(struct task_group *tg, struct rt_rq *rt_rq,
else
rt_se->rt_rq = parent->my_q;
- rt_se->rt_rq = &rq->rt;
rt_se->my_q = rt_rq;
rt_se->parent = parent;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rt_se->run_list);
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index 3432d57..95c408e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ void dec_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
#endif
}
-static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
+static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
inc_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
}
-static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
+static void __dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
@@ -480,11 +480,10 @@ static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
* Because the prio of an upper entry depends on the lower
* entries, we must remove entries top - down.
*/
-static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct task_struct *p)
+static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
- struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, *back = NULL;
+ struct sched_rt_entity *back = NULL;
- rt_se = &p->rt;
for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
rt_se->back = back;
back = rt_se;
@@ -492,7 +491,26 @@ static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct task_struct *p)
for (rt_se = back; rt_se; rt_se = rt_se->back) {
if (on_rt_rq(rt_se))
- dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
+ __dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
+ }
+}
+
+static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
+{
+ dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se);
+ for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se)
+ __enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se);
+}
+
+static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
+{
+ dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se);
+
+ for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
+ struct rt_rq *rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
+
+ if (rt_rq && rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
+ __enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se);
}
}
@@ -506,32 +524,15 @@ static void enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup)
if (wakeup)
rt_se->timeout = 0;
- dequeue_rt_stack(p);
-
- /*
- * enqueue everybody, bottom - up.
- */
- for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se)
- enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se);
+ enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se);
}
static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
{
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;
- struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
update_curr_rt(rq);
-
- dequeue_rt_stack(p);
-
- /*
- * re-enqueue all non-empty rt_rq entities.
- */
- for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
- rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
- if (rt_rq && rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
- enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se);
- }
+ dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-17 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-14 22:26 [BUG: NULL pointer dereference] cgroups and RT scheduling interact badly Daniel K.
2008-06-16 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-16 13:14 ` Daniel K.
2008-06-16 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-16 14:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-16 15:11 ` Daniel K.
2008-06-16 15:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-17 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-06-17 12:25 ` Daniel K.
2008-06-17 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-17 20:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-17 21:03 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-06-17 21:48 ` Daniel K.
2008-06-18 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-18 13:35 ` Daniel K.
2008-06-18 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1213692557.16944.153.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dk@uw.no \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox