* [PATCH 1/3] h8300: Use packed struct rather than memmove for unaligned access
@ 2008-06-24 0:28 Harvey Harrison
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2008-06-24 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yoshinori Sato; +Cc: Andrew Morton, LKML
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
---
There are only 3 arches that use the memmove implementation, do you see
any problems with using the packed struct implementation so the memmove
version could be removed?
include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h b/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
index b8d06c7..ab851e7 100644
--- a/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
#ifndef _ASM_H8300_UNALIGNED_H
#define _ASM_H8300_UNALIGNED_H
-#include <linux/unaligned/be_memmove.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
#include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
#include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
--
1.5.6.290.gc4e15
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-06-24 0:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-24 0:28 [PATCH 1/3] h8300: Use packed struct rather than memmove for unaligned access Harvey Harrison
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox