* [PATCH 2/3] m32r: Use packed struct rather than memmove for unaligned access
@ 2008-06-24 0:28 Harvey Harrison
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Harvey Harrison @ 2008-06-24 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hirokazu Takata; +Cc: Andrew Morton, LKML
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
---
There are only 3 arches that use the memmove implementation, do you see
any problems with using the packed struct implementation so the memmove
version could be removed?
include/asm-m32r/unaligned.h | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-m32r/unaligned.h b/include/asm-m32r/unaligned.h
index 377eb20..86ea884 100644
--- a/include/asm-m32r/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-m32r/unaligned.h
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
#define _ASM_M32R_UNALIGNED_H
#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN__)
-# include <linux/unaligned/le_memmove.h>
+# include <linux/unaligned/le_struct.h>
# include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h>
# include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
# define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_le
# define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_le
#else
-# include <linux/unaligned/be_memmove.h>
+# include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
# include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
# include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
# define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_be
--
1.5.6.290.gc4e15
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-06-24 0:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-24 0:28 [PATCH 2/3] m32r: Use packed struct rather than memmove for unaligned access Harvey Harrison
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox