From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework v3
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:10:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214327453.6563.14.camel@lts-notebook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080624114006.D81C.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 11:43 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi
>
> > I merged kamezawa-san's SHMEM related fix.
> > this patch works well >2H.
> > and, I am going to test on stress workload during this week end.
> >
> > but I hope recieve review at first.
> > thus I post it now.
>
> Unfortunately, my machine crashed last night ;-)
> I'll dig it.
I ran 26-rc5-mm3 with 5 split/unevictable lru patches that you posted on
19june. I replaced patch 5 of that series with the subject patch
[rework v3, merged SHMEM fix]. This kernel ran my 'usex' stress load
overnight for 23+ hours on both ia64 and x86_64 platforms with no
problems. I evidently did not hit the problem you did.
I'm rebuilding with a patch to a small problem that I discovered along
with your recent patch to "prevent incorrect oom...". I'll let you know
how that goes as well.
I'll send along two additional patches shortly.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-24 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-21 10:00 [RFC][PATCH] putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework v3 KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-24 2:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-24 17:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2008-06-24 17:55 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-24 19:11 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-24 19:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-24 17:29 ` [PATCH] fix2 to " Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-24 17:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-24 9:49 ` [RFC][PATCH] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-24 9:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-06-24 17:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-24 17:19 ` [PATCH] fix to " Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-24 17:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-24 17:48 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-06-24 18:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1214327453.6563.14.camel@lts-notebook \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox