From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
andi@firstfloor.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86 boot: add E820_RESVD_KERN
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:38:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214818706.23677.8.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440806300215w31abbcb3h6a42395e11701713@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 02:15 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[...]
> >
> > I mean memory area reserved with reserved_early() or e820_update_range()
> > before reserve_setup_data() is called.
>
> before parse_setup_data, reserve_early is called for
> 1. kernel text/data/bss + initial pgt
> 2. ramdisk
> 3. ebda
> e820_update_range is not called.
> at this time early_res have RAM reserved by kernel.
>
> then setup_memory_map is called, so e820 have some ranges...directly
> from e820 table
>
> next need to call parse_setup_data
> it will add some entries in e820
>
> then reserve_setup_data is called, it will use e820_update_range to
> reserve setup_data itself directly in e820
>
> ...
Yes. There is no real conflict now. I think a better rule is:
- Reserve memory area (directly from BIOS or boot-loader, not from
find_e820_area) needed as early as possible.
- Don't touch reserved area until all possible reservation is made, that
is, before conflict check is done.
> >
> > And because there is no conflict check in e820_update_range(), what to
> > deal with potential conflict between setup_data and other memory area
> > regardless which one is reserved earlier?
>
> find_e820_area will make sure it only find ram from e820 and it is not
> conflict with early_res
For find_e820_area, this is safe enough. But what about conflict between
setup_data and ebda or ramdisk?
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-30 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-26 6:32 [PATCH 1/2] x86 boot: add E820_RESVD_KERN Huang, Ying
2008-06-26 7:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-26 7:48 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-26 9:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-27 2:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-27 2:48 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-27 2:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-27 3:03 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-27 5:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-27 22:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 7:03 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-30 7:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 7:51 ` Huang, Ying
2008-06-30 9:15 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 9:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 9:38 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2008-06-30 19:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 19:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 22:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-30 23:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-01 1:09 ` Huang, Ying
2008-07-01 1:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-01 8:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01 2:45 ` Huang, Ying
2008-07-01 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1214818706.23677.8.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox