From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
safford@watson.ibm.com, serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
sailer@watson.ibm.com, zohar@us.ibm.com,
debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] integrity: TPM cleanup
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:01:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1215518507.5013.44.camel@new-host> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0807081122390.10307@us.intercode.com.au>
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 11:33 +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> > This patchset contains 5 patches.
> > Patch 1/5 integrity: TPM cleanup (scripts/Lindent and other)
> > Patch 2/5 integrity: TPM internal kernel interface
> > Patch 3/5 integrity: special fs magic
>
> I've previously reviewed and added "Reviewed-by:" lines for the above.
>
> If the patches have not changed significantly, would you please ensure
> that the Reviewed-by/Acked-by/Signed-off lines are captured with them for
> subsequent postings ?
>
> If the patches have changed and you've dropped these lines, please note
> what has changed.
>
> It's also a good idea to cc people who have reviewed previous versions or
> postings of the patches when you repost them.
>
>
> - James
No, nothing has changed in the first 3 patches, except for removing
the [RFC] in the Subject line. Thank you for pointing out the need to
capture the Reviewed-by/Acked-by/Signed-off lines and copying the reviewers.
Will do in the future.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-08 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080707192529.489789904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2008-07-07 21:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] integrity: TPM cleanup Mimi Zohar
2008-07-08 1:33 ` James Morris
2008-07-08 12:01 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2008-07-15 23:13 ` James Morris
2008-07-16 20:04 ` Mimi Zohar
2008-07-16 20:04 ` [Patch 1/5]integrity: " Mimi Zohar
2008-07-16 20:05 ` [Patch 2/5]integrity: TPM internel kernel interface Mimi Zohar
2008-07-16 20:05 ` [Patch 3/5] integrity: special fs magic Mimi Zohar
2008-07-16 20:05 ` [PATCH 4/5]integrity: Linux Integrity Module(LIM) Mimi Zohar
2008-07-16 20:05 ` [Patch 5/5]integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider Mimi Zohar
2008-07-16 23:56 ` James Morris
2008-07-17 21:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2008-07-22 15:08 ` James Morris
2008-07-07 21:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface Mimi Zohar
2008-07-07 21:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] integrity: special fs magic Mimi Zohar
2008-07-07 21:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] integrity: Linux Integrity Module(LIM) Mimi Zohar
2008-07-08 1:31 ` James Morris
2008-07-08 12:04 ` Mimi Zohar
2008-07-07 21:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider Mimi Zohar
2008-07-07 22:03 ` LTP IMA path Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1215518507.5013.44.camel@new-host \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=safford@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=sailer@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox