Re: [patch 0/17] Series to introduce WARN()... a WARN_ON() variant that takes printk arguments

Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-09T13:31:46Z

On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 04:46:13 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Well I haven't got onto processing these patches in detail yet. An
> open questions is why the damn thing was resubmitted from scratch
> when I've already merged it and fixed various rejects and had to fix
> several bugs in it. Do those rejects need to be re-fixed? Were my
> bugfixes folded back? I haven't looked yet. I'll need to generate
> the incremental diff and see what was done.

I started with the version in -mm (and had to do one reject fix against
-next) with folding the 2 -fix's into it.

--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org