From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix spurious BUG_ON() in mark_bootmem()
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:09:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1215637772.18157.6.camel@lts-notebook> (raw)
Against: 2.6.26-rc8-mm1
Fixes problem introduced by patches:
bootmem-factor-out-the-marking-of-a-pfn-range.patch
bootmem-replace-node_boot_start-in-struct-bootmem_data.patch
HP ia64 NUMA platform fails to boot 26-rc8-mm1, hitting BUG_ON()
in mm/bootmem.c:mark_bootmem().
After linking all bootmem chunks, the 'bdata_list' on HP ia64 numa
platforms looks something like this:
node 4: 0x0-0x8000
node 0: 0x1c008000-0x1c07ec00
node 1: 0x1c800000-0x1c87f000
node 2: 0x1d000000-0x1d07f000
node 3: 0x1d800000-0x1d87f000
[Node 4 is a pseudo-node generated by the platform firmware to
contain a configurable amount of zero-based, hardware interleaved
memory. 0x8000 pages or 512M is the minimum that can be configured.]
First call to mark_bootmem() [from free_bootmem()] called with:
start-end: 0x1c008063-0x1c008262, reserve: 0, flags: 0
I.e, NOT in the first chunk of the list.
However, the "if (pos < bdata->node_min_pfn)" in the loop fails
to test the start address of the argument range [in 'pos'] against
the end of the chunk. So, it treats the range as being in the node
4 chunk. Second time thru' the loop, pos == 0x8000 is <
bdata->node_min_pfn and pos != start, so we trip the BUG_ON().
This patch enhances the if condition to skip chunks that do not
overlap the argument range, allowing 26-rc8-mm1 to boot on this
platform.
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
mm/bootmem.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.26-rc8-mm1/mm/bootmem.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.26-rc8-mm1.orig/mm/bootmem.c 2008-07-09 16:11:23.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc8-mm1/mm/bootmem.c 2008-07-09 16:13:46.000000000 -0400
@@ -299,7 +299,8 @@ static int __init mark_bootmem(unsigned
int err;
unsigned long max;
- if (pos < bdata->node_min_pfn) {
+ if (pos < bdata->node_min_pfn ||
+ pos >= bdata->node_low_pfn) {
BUG_ON(pos != start);
continue;
}
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-09 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-09 21:09 Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2008-07-09 22:43 ` [PATCH] Fix spurious BUG_ON() in mark_bootmem() Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1215637772.18157.6.camel@lts-notebook \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@saeurebad.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox