public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Fries <david@fries.net>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 20/30] W1: ds2490.c add support for strong pullup
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:51:35 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1215784306963-git-send-email-johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12157843054074-git-send-email-johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>

Add strong pullup support for ds2490 driver, also drop mdelay(750),
which busy waits, usage in favour of msleep for long delays.  Now with
msleep only being called when the strong pullup is active, one wire
bus operations are only taking minimal system overhead.

The new set_pullup will only enable the strong pullup when requested,
which is expected to be the only write operation that will benefit
from a strong pullup.

Signed-off-by: David Fries <david@fries.net>
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>

---
 drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c |   76 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c b/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c
index c8365fb..8ab2c86 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c
@@ -98,11 +98,6 @@
 #define BRANCH_MAIN			0xCC
 #define BRANCH_AUX			0x33
 
-/*
- * Duration of the strong pull-up pulse in milliseconds.
- */
-#define PULLUP_PULSE_DURATION		750
-
 /* Status flags */
 #define ST_SPUA				0x01  /* Strong Pull-up is active */
 #define ST_PRGA				0x02  /* 12V programming pulse is being generated */
@@ -131,6 +126,11 @@ struct ds_device
 
 	int			ep[NUM_EP];
 
+	/* Strong PullUp
+	 * 0: pullup not active, else duration in milliseconds
+	 */
+	int			spu_sleep;
+
 	struct w1_bus_master	master;
 };
 
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int ds_send_control_cmd(struct ds_device *dev, u16 value, u16 index)
 
 	return err;
 }
-#if 0
+
 static int ds_send_control_mode(struct ds_device *dev, u16 value, u16 index)
 {
 	int err;
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int ds_send_control_mode(struct ds_device *dev, u16 value, u16 index)
 
 	return err;
 }
-#endif
+
 static int ds_send_control(struct ds_device *dev, u16 value, u16 index)
 {
 	int err;
@@ -294,14 +294,6 @@ static int ds_recv_status(struct ds_device *dev, struct ds_status *st)
 		if (count < 0)
 			return err;
 	}
-#if 0
-	if (st->status & ST_IDLE) {
-		printk(KERN_INFO "Resetting pulse after ST_IDLE.\n");
-		err = ds_start_pulse(dev, PULLUP_PULSE_DURATION);
-		if (err)
-			return err;
-	}
-#endif
 
 	return err;
 }
@@ -472,32 +464,26 @@ static int ds_set_speed(struct ds_device *dev, int speed)
 }
 #endif  /*  0  */
 
-static int ds_start_pulse(struct ds_device *dev, int delay)
+static int ds_set_pullup(struct ds_device *dev, int delay)
 {
 	int err;
 	u8 del = 1 + (u8)(delay >> 4);
-	struct ds_status st;
-
-#if 0
-	err = ds_stop_pulse(dev, 10);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
-	err = ds_send_control_mode(dev, MOD_PULSE_EN, PULSE_SPUE);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-#endif
-	err = ds_send_control(dev, COMM_SET_DURATION | COMM_IM, del);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
 
-	err = ds_send_control(dev, COMM_PULSE | COMM_IM | COMM_F, 0);
+	dev->spu_sleep = 0;
+	err = ds_send_control_mode(dev, MOD_PULSE_EN, delay?PULSE_SPUE:0);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	mdelay(delay);
+	if (delay) {
+		err = ds_send_control(dev, COMM_SET_DURATION | COMM_IM, del);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
 
-	ds_wait_status(dev, &st);
+		/* Just storing delay would not get the trunication and
+		 * roundup.
+		 */
+		dev->spu_sleep = del<<4;
+	}
 
 	return err;
 }
@@ -558,6 +544,9 @@ static int ds_write_byte(struct ds_device *dev, u8 byte)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
+	if (dev->spu_sleep)
+		msleep(dev->spu_sleep);
+
 	err = ds_wait_status(dev, &st);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -566,8 +555,6 @@ static int ds_write_byte(struct ds_device *dev, u8 byte)
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 
-	ds_start_pulse(dev, PULLUP_PULSE_DURATION);
-
 	return !(byte == rbyte);
 }
 
@@ -603,7 +590,7 @@ static int ds_read_block(struct ds_device *dev, u8 *buf, int len)
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 
-	err = ds_send_control(dev, COMM_BLOCK_IO | COMM_IM | COMM_SPU, len);
+	err = ds_send_control(dev, COMM_BLOCK_IO | COMM_IM, len);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -630,14 +617,15 @@ static int ds_write_block(struct ds_device *dev, u8 *buf, int len)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
+	if (dev->spu_sleep)
+		msleep(dev->spu_sleep);
+
 	ds_wait_status(dev, &st);
 
 	err = ds_recv_data(dev, buf, len);
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 
-	ds_start_pulse(dev, PULLUP_PULSE_DURATION);
-
 	return !(err == len);
 }
 
@@ -803,6 +791,16 @@ static u8 ds9490r_reset(void *data)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static u8 ds9490r_set_pullup(void *data, int delay)
+{
+	struct ds_device *dev = data;
+
+	if (ds_set_pullup(dev, delay))
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int ds_w1_init(struct ds_device *dev)
 {
 	memset(&dev->master, 0, sizeof(struct w1_bus_master));
@@ -816,6 +814,7 @@ static int ds_w1_init(struct ds_device *dev)
 	dev->master.read_block	= &ds9490r_read_block;
 	dev->master.write_block	= &ds9490r_write_block;
 	dev->master.reset_bus	= &ds9490r_reset;
+	dev->master.set_pullup	= &ds9490r_set_pullup;
 
 	return w1_add_master_device(&dev->master);
 }
@@ -839,6 +838,7 @@ static int ds_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
 		printk(KERN_INFO "Failed to allocate new DS9490R structure.\n");
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
+	dev->spu_sleep = 0;
 	dev->udev = usb_get_dev(udev);
 	if (!dev->udev) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
-- 
1.4.4.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-11 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-11 13:51 w1 updates Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/30] W1: fix deadlocks and remove w1_control_thread Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/30] W1: abort search early on on exit Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/30] W1: don't delay search start Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 4/30] W1: w1_process, block or sleep Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 5/30] W1: feature, enable hardware strong pullup Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 6/30] W1: feature, w1_therm.c use strong pullup and documentation Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 7/30] W1: be able to manually add and remove slaves Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 8/30] W1: recode w1_slave_found logic Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 9/30] W1: new module parameter search_count Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 10/30] W1: Document add, remove, search_count, and pullup Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 11/30] W1: w1_slave_read_id read bug, use device_attribute Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 12/30] W1: w1_therm fix user buffer overflow and cat Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 13/30] W1: w1_family, remove unused variable need_exit Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 14/30] W1: w1_therm consistent mutex access code cleanup Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 15/30] W1: w1_int.c use first available master number Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 16/30] W1: w1.c s/printk/dev_dbg/ Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 17/30] W1: w1_io.c reset comments and msleep Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 18/30] W1: ds1wm.c msleep for reset Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 19/30] W1: ds2490.c correct print message Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 21/30] W1: ds2490.c ds_write_bit, grouping error, disable readback Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 22/30] W1: ds2490.c disable bit read and write Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 23/30] W1: ds2490.c simplify and fix ds_touch_bit Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 24/30] W1: ds2490.c ds_dump_status rework Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 25/30] W1: ds2490.c ds_reset remove ds_wait_status Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 26/30] W1: ds2490.c reset ds2490 in init Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 27/30] W1: ds2490.c magic number work Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 28/30] W1: ds2490.c ds_write_block remove extra ds_wait_status Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 29/30] W1: Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490 update Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-14 20:40   ` Randy Dunlap
2008-07-15  2:16     ` David Fries
2008-07-17 21:52       ` Randy Dunlap
2008-07-15  2:17     ` David Fries
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 30/30] W1: ds2490.c optimize ds_set_pullup Evgeniy Polyakov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-29  2:04 [PATCH 0/30] W1: w1 core fixes, ds2490 updates, strong pullup David Fries
2008-07-29  2:25 ` [PATCH 20/30] W1: ds2490.c add support for " David Fries
2008-07-29 23:13 ` [PATCH 0/30] W1: w1 core fixes, ds2490 updates, " Andrew Morton
2008-07-31  2:49   ` [PATCH 20/30] W1: ds2490.c add support for " David Fries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1215784306963-git-send-email-johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fries.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox