From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Fries <david@fries.net>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 30/30] W1: ds2490.c optimize ds_set_pullup
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:51:45 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1215784307247-git-send-email-johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12157843054074-git-send-email-johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Optimize the ds_set_pullup function. For a strong pullup to be sent
the ds2490 has to have both the strong pullup mode enabled, and the
specific write operation has to have the SPU bit enabled. Previously
the write always had the SPU bit enabled and both the duration and
model was set when a strong pullup was requested. Now the strong
pullup mode is enabled at initialization time, the delay is updated
only when the value changes, and the write SPU bit is set only when a
strong pullup is required. This removes two or three bus transactions
per strong pullup request.
Signed-off-by: David Fries <david@fries.net>
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
---
drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c b/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c
index 466048f..d38ac01 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c
@@ -141,6 +141,10 @@ struct ds_device
* 0: pullup not active, else duration in milliseconds
*/
int spu_sleep;
+ /* spu_bit contains COMM_SPU or 0 depending on if the strong pullup
+ * should be active or not for writes.
+ */
+ u16 spu_bit;
struct w1_bus_master master;
};
@@ -311,6 +315,25 @@ static void ds_dump_status(struct ds_device *dev, unsigned char *buf, int count)
}
}
+static void ds_reset_device(struct ds_device *dev)
+{
+ ds_send_control_cmd(dev, CTL_RESET_DEVICE, 0);
+ /* Always allow strong pullup which allow individual writes to use
+ * the strong pullup.
+ */
+ if (ds_send_control_mode(dev, MOD_PULSE_EN, PULSE_SPUE))
+ printk(KERN_ERR "ds_reset_device: "
+ "Error allowing strong pullup\n");
+ /* Chip strong pullup time was cleared. */
+ if (dev->spu_sleep) {
+ /* lower 4 bits are 0, see ds_set_pullup */
+ u8 del = dev->spu_sleep>>4;
+ if (ds_send_control(dev, COMM_SET_DURATION | COMM_IM, del))
+ printk(KERN_ERR "ds_reset_device: "
+ "Error setting duration\n");
+ }
+}
+
static int ds_recv_data(struct ds_device *dev, unsigned char *buf, int size)
{
int count, err;
@@ -444,7 +467,7 @@ static int ds_wait_status(struct ds_device *dev, struct ds_status *st)
if (err >= 16 && st->status & ST_EPOF) {
printk(KERN_INFO "Resetting device after ST_EPOF.\n");
- ds_send_control_cmd(dev, CTL_RESET_DEVICE, 0);
+ ds_reset_device(dev);
/* Always dump the device status. */
count = 101;
}
@@ -509,24 +532,26 @@ static int ds_set_speed(struct ds_device *dev, int speed)
static int ds_set_pullup(struct ds_device *dev, int delay)
{
- int err;
+ int err = 0;
u8 del = 1 + (u8)(delay >> 4);
+ /* Just storing delay would not get the trunication and roundup. */
+ int ms = del<<4;
+
+ /* Enable spu_bit if a delay is set. */
+ dev->spu_bit = delay?COMM_SPU:0;
+ /* If delay is zero, it has already been disabled, if the time is
+ * the same as the hardware was last programmed to, there is also
+ * nothing more to do. Compare with the recalculated value ms
+ * rather than del or delay which can have a different value.
+ */
+ if (delay == 0 || ms == dev->spu_sleep)
+ return err;
- dev->spu_sleep = 0;
- err = ds_send_control_mode(dev, MOD_PULSE_EN, delay?PULSE_SPUE:0);
+ err = ds_send_control(dev, COMM_SET_DURATION | COMM_IM, del);
if (err)
return err;
- if (delay) {
- err = ds_send_control(dev, COMM_SET_DURATION | COMM_IM, del);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
- /* Just storing delay would not get the trunication and
- * roundup.
- */
- dev->spu_sleep = del<<4;
- }
+ dev->spu_sleep = ms;
return err;
}
@@ -577,11 +602,11 @@ static int ds_write_byte(struct ds_device *dev, u8 byte)
struct ds_status st;
u8 rbyte;
- err = ds_send_control(dev, COMM_BYTE_IO | COMM_IM | COMM_SPU, byte);
+ err = ds_send_control(dev, COMM_BYTE_IO | COMM_IM | dev->spu_bit, byte);
if (err)
return err;
- if (dev->spu_sleep)
+ if (dev->spu_bit)
msleep(dev->spu_sleep);
err = ds_wait_status(dev, &st);
@@ -648,11 +673,11 @@ static int ds_write_block(struct ds_device *dev, u8 *buf, int len)
if (err < 0)
return err;
- err = ds_send_control(dev, COMM_BLOCK_IO | COMM_IM | COMM_SPU, len);
+ err = ds_send_control(dev, COMM_BLOCK_IO | COMM_IM | dev->spu_bit, len);
if (err)
return err;
- if (dev->spu_sleep)
+ if (dev->spu_bit)
msleep(dev->spu_sleep);
ds_wait_status(dev, &st);
@@ -849,7 +874,7 @@ static int ds_w1_init(struct ds_device *dev)
* the input buffer. This will cause the next read to fail
* see the note in ds_recv_data.
*/
- ds_send_control_cmd(dev, CTL_RESET_DEVICE, 0);
+ ds_reset_device(dev);
dev->master.data = dev;
dev->master.touch_bit = &ds9490r_touch_bit;
@@ -892,6 +917,7 @@ static int ds_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
return -ENOMEM;
}
dev->spu_sleep = 0;
+ dev->spu_bit = 0;
dev->udev = usb_get_dev(udev);
if (!dev->udev) {
err = -ENOMEM;
--
1.4.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-11 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-11 13:51 w1 updates Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/30] W1: fix deadlocks and remove w1_control_thread Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/30] W1: abort search early on on exit Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/30] W1: don't delay search start Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 4/30] W1: w1_process, block or sleep Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 5/30] W1: feature, enable hardware strong pullup Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 6/30] W1: feature, w1_therm.c use strong pullup and documentation Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 7/30] W1: be able to manually add and remove slaves Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 8/30] W1: recode w1_slave_found logic Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 9/30] W1: new module parameter search_count Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 10/30] W1: Document add, remove, search_count, and pullup Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 11/30] W1: w1_slave_read_id read bug, use device_attribute Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 12/30] W1: w1_therm fix user buffer overflow and cat Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 13/30] W1: w1_family, remove unused variable need_exit Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 14/30] W1: w1_therm consistent mutex access code cleanup Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 15/30] W1: w1_int.c use first available master number Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 16/30] W1: w1.c s/printk/dev_dbg/ Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 17/30] W1: w1_io.c reset comments and msleep Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 18/30] W1: ds1wm.c msleep for reset Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 19/30] W1: ds2490.c correct print message Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 20/30] W1: ds2490.c add support for strong pullup Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 21/30] W1: ds2490.c ds_write_bit, grouping error, disable readback Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 22/30] W1: ds2490.c disable bit read and write Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 23/30] W1: ds2490.c simplify and fix ds_touch_bit Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 24/30] W1: ds2490.c ds_dump_status rework Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 25/30] W1: ds2490.c ds_reset remove ds_wait_status Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 26/30] W1: ds2490.c reset ds2490 in init Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 27/30] W1: ds2490.c magic number work Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 28/30] W1: ds2490.c ds_write_block remove extra ds_wait_status Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-11 13:51 ` [PATCH 29/30] W1: Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490 update Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-14 20:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-07-15 2:16 ` David Fries
2008-07-17 21:52 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-07-15 2:17 ` David Fries
2008-07-11 13:51 ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-29 2:04 [PATCH 0/30] W1: w1 core fixes, ds2490 updates, strong pullup David Fries
2008-07-29 2:30 ` [PATCH 30/30] W1: ds2490.c optimize ds_set_pullup David Fries
2008-07-29 23:13 ` [PATCH 0/30] W1: w1 core fixes, ds2490 updates, strong pullup Andrew Morton
2008-07-31 2:50 ` [PATCH 30/30] W1: ds2490.c optimize ds_set_pullup David Fries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1215784307247-git-send-email-johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fries.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox