public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	miaox@cn.fujitsu.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: current linux-2.6.git: cpusets completely broken
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:14:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1215861285.5405.6.camel@earth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1215859526.5405.3.camel@earth>

On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 12:45 +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> 2008/7/12 Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>:
> > 2008/7/12 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Can somebody else please test/ack/review it too? This should eventually
> >>> go into 2.6.26 if it doesn't break anything else.
> >>
> >> And Dmitry, _please_ also explain what was going on. Why did things break
> >> from calling common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug() too much? That function is
> >> called pretty randomly anyway (for just about any random CPU event), so
> >> why did it fail in some circumstances?
> >
> > Upon CPU_DOWN_PREPARE, update_sched_domains() ->
> > detach_destroy_domains(&cpu_online_map) ;
> > does the following:
> >
> > /*
> >  * Force a reinitialization of the sched domains hierarchy. The domains
> >  * and groups cannot be updated in place without racing with the balancing
> >  * code, so we temporarily attach all running cpus to the NULL domain
> >  * which will prevent rebalancing while the sched domains are recalculated.
> >  */
> >
> > The sched-domains should be rebuilt when a CPU_DOWN ops. is completed,
> > effectivelly either upon CPU_DEAD{_FROZEN} (upon success) or
> > CPU_DOWN_FAILED{_FROZEN} (upon failure -- restore the things to their
> > initial state). That's what update_sched_domains() also does but only
> > for !CPUSETS case.
> >
> > With Max's patch, sched-domains' reinitialization is delegated to CPUSETS code:
> >
> > cpuset_handle_cpuhp() -> common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug() ->
> > rebuild_sched_domains()
> >
> > which as you've said "called pretty randomly anyway", e.g. for CPU_UP_PREPARE.
> >
> > [ ah, then rebuild_sched_domains() should not be there. It should be
> > nop for MEMPLUG events I presume - should make another patch. ]
> 
> I had in mind something like this:
> 
> [ yes, probably the patch makes things somewhat uglier. I tried to bring a minimal amount of changes so far, just to emulate the 'old' behavior of update_sched_domains().
> I guess, common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug() needs to be split up into cpu- and mem-hotplug parts to make it cleaner ]
> 
> (not tested yet)
> 
> ---

argh, this one compiles (will test shortly).


Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>


diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 9fceb97..798b3ab 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -1882,7 +1882,7 @@ static void scan_for_empty_cpusets(const struct
cpuset *root)
  * in order to minimize text size.
  */
 
-static void common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug(void)
+static void common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug(int rebuild_sd)
 {
 	cgroup_lock();
 
@@ -1894,7 +1894,8 @@ static void common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug(void)
 	 * Scheduler destroys domains on hotplug events.
 	 * Rebuild them based on the current settings.
 	 */
-	rebuild_sched_domains();
+	if (rebuild_sd)
+		rebuild_sched_domains();
 
 	cgroup_unlock();
 }
@@ -1912,11 +1913,22 @@ static void common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug(void)
 static int cpuset_handle_cpuhp(struct notifier_block *unused_nb,
 				unsigned long phase, void *unused_cpu)
 {
-	if (phase == CPU_DYING || phase == CPU_DYING_FROZEN)
+	switch (phase) {
+	case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
+	case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
+	case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
+	case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN:
+	case CPU_ONLINE:
+	case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
+	case CPU_DEAD:
+	case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
+		common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug(1);
+		break;
+	default:
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+	}
 
-	common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug();
-	return 0;
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
@@ -1929,7 +1941,7 @@ static int cpuset_handle_cpuhp(struct
notifier_block *unused_nb,
 
 void cpuset_track_online_nodes(void)
 {
-	common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug();
+	common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug(0);
 }
 #endif
 




  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-12 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-12 10:45 current linux-2.6.git: cpusets completely broken Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 11:14 ` Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2008-07-13  0:10   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-13  8:50     ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-13  9:41       ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-11 19:07 Vegard Nossum
2008-07-11 19:36 ` Paul Menage
2008-07-11 19:43   ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-11 20:07     ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-11 23:03     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-11 23:19       ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-11 23:53         ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12  3:17       ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-12  3:28         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 10:00           ` Miao Xie
2008-07-12 11:05             ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 19:15             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 10:04           ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 19:19             ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-12 20:10             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 21:30               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 22:07                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 22:43                   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-12 23:01                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 23:00                   ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-12 23:04                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 23:19                       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 23:25                         ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 23:05                     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-12 23:17                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13  9:53                         ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-13 17:10                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 17:42                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-13 17:46                             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 18:13                               ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-13 18:19                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-13 18:38                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-13 18:20                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 23:25                       ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-13 15:29                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-14 15:49                   ` Mike Travis
2008-07-14 22:38                 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-14 23:05                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15  0:00                     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-15  0:23                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15  2:21                         ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-07-15  3:03                           ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-15  4:12                             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15  8:32                               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-15  8:42                                 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-15  8:57                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-15  9:12                                     ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-16  6:35                                     ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-16  7:10                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-16 17:01                                         ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-15  3:23                     ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-15  3:36                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15  3:47                         ` Steven Rostedt
2008-07-15  4:04                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-15  4:16                             ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1215861285.5405.6.camel@earth \
    --to=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox