From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs (part1: use kprobe symbol_name/offset instead of address)
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:03:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216332186.5515.99.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487FBB56.4070709@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 17:36 -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 09:18 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> OK, thought about it. There seem to be two possible solutions
> >>
> >> 1. Get systemtap always to offset from non-static functions. This
> >> will use the standard linker to ensure uniqueness (a module
> >> qualifier will still need to be added to the struct kprobe for
> >> lookup, since modules can duplicate unexported kernel symbols).
> >> 2. Add the filename as a discriminator for duplicate symbols in the
> >> kallsyms program (would still need module qualifier). This is
> >> appealing because the path name would be printed in the kernel
> >> trace to help with oops tracking
> >>
> >> This is where negotiations come in. To me 2. looks to be better because
> >> it will help us with oops tracking. On the other hand, it's usually
> >> pretty obvious from the stack trace context which files the duplicate
> >> symbols are actually in; what do other people think?
> >
> > Just by way of illustration, this is systemtap fixed up according to
> > suggestion number 1. You can see now using your test case that we get:
> >
> > # probes
> > kernel.function("do_open@fs/block_dev.c:929") /* pc=<lookup_bdev+0x90> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
> > kernel.function("do_open@fs/nfsctl.c:24") /* pc=<sys_nfsservctl+0x6a> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
> > kernel.function("do_open@ipc/mqueue.c:642") /* pc=<sys_mq_unlink+0x130> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
>
> Hi James,
>
> Thank you for updating the patch.
> Unfortunately, I found another scenario; if someone make a module which
> has EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_open), it's a non-static function. but there are
> other static version do_open in kallsyms.
> Here, I tested it and got below;
>
> $ stap --kelf -e 'probe module("test").function("do_open"){}' -p2
> # probes
> module("test").function("do_open@?") /* pc=<do_open+0x0> */ /* <- module("test").function("do_open") */
>
> And I think similar issue will occur even if it is embedded in vmlinux.
Actually, no. This is only a module problem ... it's triggered by the
fact that the module namespace is different from the kernel's global
namespace. To get around this, I think the actual module (or null for
kernel) has to become an extra parameter to struct kprobe.
> By the way, can this patch solve the issue of -ffunction-sections?
Actually not entirely, no, if we go for only global symbols. The
compiler is entitled to spit out a section even for a static function as
long as it has a real body. If the module loader insterts stubs then
even an offset from a nearby function could end up being wrong
> Anyway, I think we still need solution no.2.
I'll cook up a patch and run it by lkml to try to gauge the reaction.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-17 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-15 18:33 [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs (part1: use kprobe symbol_name/offset instead of address) James Bottomley
2008-07-16 22:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-16 23:03 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 0:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-17 1:49 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 14:18 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 16:58 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 21:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-17 22:03 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-07-21 14:20 ` James Bottomley
[not found] ` <1216313914.5515.25.camel__21144.9282979176$1216314027$gmane$org@localhost.localdomain>
2008-07-17 18:30 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-17 20:12 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 20:26 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-17 21:06 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 21:33 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-17 22:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-22 18:00 ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-22 18:11 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-22 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <1216751477.7257.115.camel__19834.5970632092$1216751567$gmane$org@twins>
2008-07-22 18:48 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 15:04 ` systemtap & backward compatibility, was Re: [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 15:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-23 15:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 20:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu
[not found] ` <20080723082856.334f9c17__2909.60763018138$1216827051$gmane$org@infradead.org>
2008-07-23 16:41 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 16:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-23 17:34 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 18:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-23 22:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-18 9:11 ` [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs (part1: use kprobe symbol_name/offset instead of address) Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 10:31 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 10:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 13:02 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-18 13:07 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 13:28 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-18 13:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 13:21 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-18 13:37 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
[not found] <1216146802.3312.95.camel__45052.4692344063$1216146917$gmane$org@localhost.localdomain>
2008-07-15 19:41 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-15 19:52 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-15 20:07 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-15 20:24 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-15 22:18 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-16 2:06 ` James Bottomley
2008-07-16 10:56 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-16 14:56 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1216332186.5515.99.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox