public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, systemtap@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs (part1: use kprobe symbol_name/offset instead of address)
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:03:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216332186.5515.99.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487FBB56.4070709@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 17:36 -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 09:18 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> OK, thought about it.  There seem to be two possible solutions
> >>
> >>      1. Get systemtap always to offset from non-static functions.  This
> >>         will use the standard linker to ensure uniqueness (a module
> >>         qualifier will still need to be added to the struct kprobe for
> >>         lookup, since modules can duplicate unexported kernel symbols).
> >>      2. Add the filename as a discriminator for duplicate symbols in the
> >>         kallsyms program (would still need module qualifier).  This is
> >>         appealing because the path name would be printed in the kernel
> >>         trace to help with oops tracking
> >>
> >> This is where negotiations come in.  To me 2. looks to be better because
> >> it will help us with oops tracking.  On the other hand, it's usually
> >> pretty obvious from the stack trace context which files the duplicate
> >> symbols are actually in; what do other people think?
> > 
> > Just by way of illustration, this is systemtap fixed up according to
> > suggestion number 1.  You can see now using your test case that we get:
> > 
> > # probes
> > kernel.function("do_open@fs/block_dev.c:929") /* pc=<lookup_bdev+0x90> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
> > kernel.function("do_open@fs/nfsctl.c:24") /* pc=<sys_nfsservctl+0x6a> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
> > kernel.function("do_open@ipc/mqueue.c:642") /* pc=<sys_mq_unlink+0x130> */ /* <- kernel.function("do_open") */
> 
> Hi James,
> 
> Thank you for updating the patch.
> Unfortunately, I found another scenario; if someone make a module which
> has EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_open), it's a non-static function. but there are
> other static version do_open in kallsyms.
> Here, I tested it and got below;
> 
> $ stap --kelf -e 'probe module("test").function("do_open"){}' -p2
> # probes
> module("test").function("do_open@?") /* pc=<do_open+0x0> */ /* <- module("test").function("do_open") */
> 
> And I think similar issue will occur even if it is embedded in vmlinux.

Actually, no.  This is only a module problem ... it's triggered by the
fact that the module namespace is different from the kernel's global
namespace.  To get around this, I think the actual module (or null for
kernel) has to become an extra parameter to struct kprobe.

> By the way, can this patch solve the issue of -ffunction-sections?

Actually not entirely, no, if we go for only global symbols.  The
compiler is entitled to spit out a section even for a static function as
long as it has a real body.  If the module loader insterts stubs then
even an offset from a nearby function could end up being wrong

> Anyway, I think we still need solution no.2.

I'll cook up a patch and run it by lkml to try to gauge the reaction.

James



  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-17 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-15 18:33 [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs (part1: use kprobe symbol_name/offset instead of address) James Bottomley
2008-07-16 22:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-16 23:03   ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17  0:05     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-17  1:49       ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 14:18         ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 16:58           ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 21:36             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-17 22:03               ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-07-21 14:20               ` James Bottomley
     [not found]           ` <1216313914.5515.25.camel__21144.9282979176$1216314027$gmane$org@localhost.localdomain>
2008-07-17 18:30             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-17 20:12               ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 20:26                 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-17 21:06                   ` James Bottomley
2008-07-17 21:33                     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-17 22:03                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-22 18:00                       ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-22 18:11                         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-22 18:31                           ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]                           ` <1216751477.7257.115.camel__19834.5970632092$1216751567$gmane$org@twins>
2008-07-22 18:48                             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 15:04                         ` systemtap & backward compatibility, was Re: [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 15:28                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-23 15:33                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-23 20:25                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
     [not found]                           ` <20080723082856.334f9c17__2909.60763018138$1216827051$gmane$org@infradead.org>
2008-07-23 16:41                             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 16:54                               ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-23 17:34                                 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-23 18:40                                   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-23 22:12                               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-18  9:11 ` [RFC] systemtap: begin the process of using proper kernel APIs (part1: use kprobe symbol_name/offset instead of address) Andi Kleen
2008-07-18  9:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 10:31     ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 10:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 10:52         ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 13:02     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-18 13:07       ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 13:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-18 13:28         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-18 13:35         ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18 13:21       ` James Bottomley
2008-07-18 13:37         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
     [not found] <1216146802.3312.95.camel__45052.4692344063$1216146917$gmane$org@localhost.localdomain>
2008-07-15 19:41 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-15 19:52   ` James Bottomley
2008-07-15 20:07     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-15 20:24       ` James Bottomley
2008-07-15 22:18         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-16  2:06           ` James Bottomley
2008-07-16 10:56             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-16 14:56               ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1216332186.5515.99.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox