From: "Eric Furman" <ericfurman@fastmail.net>
To: davids@webmaster.com, 7eggert@gmx.de,
"Morton Harrow" <mharrow@linuxmail.org>,
"Kasper Sandberg" <lkml@metanurb.dk>,
"Miod Vallat" <miod@online.fr>,
licensing@fsf.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Richard Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>,
claire.newman@canonical.com, announce@fsfeurope.org,
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com, fedora-list@redhat.com,
netbsd-users@netbsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: GPL version 4
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:05:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216436702.17606.1264270853@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKAEJDOEAC.davids@webmaster.com>
Could you guys please remove misc@openbsd.org from the cc
of this mail? Nobody here cares.
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:47:46 -0700, "David Schwartz"
<davids@webmaster.com> said:
> > Would you grant me the freedom to give away your commercial
> > product for free
> > or to incorporate it in my commercial product? Probably not. You'd instead
> > grant me less freedom. The GPL protects me from this.
>
> Except it doesn't. With or without the GPL, if he still makes his
> commercial
> product, you will still be unable to give it away or incorporate it in
> your
> commercial product. If he doesn't make it, that's just less choice for
> everyone.
>
> It may be a poorer product. It may cost him more to develop it. It may
> wind
> up not existing. But in no case will will you wind up with the freedom to
> give away his commercial product. So the GPL actually won't protect you
> from
> this at all.
>
> It will just result in him producing a poorer, more expensive, less
> compatible product -- or none at all. Either way, everyone else will have
> fewer (and/or poorer) choices. Everyone loses. Nobody wins.
>
> Note that had he been able to incorporate the GPL code in his commercial
> product, he may have passed bug fixes and improvements back to the GPL
> project. He would not have had to, of course, but if his product just
> uses a
> GPL component or library (that doesn't compete with the larger product),
> there's no reason for him not to. Everybody could have won.
>
> It's always possible he may instead elect to make a GPL'd project. This
> may
> allow him to produce a higher-quality product in less time. It may allow
> others to build on his work, and result in more freedom for everyone. He
> may
> make less money, but maybe not. The question of whether the "everybody
> loses" or the "lots of people, maybe everybody, wins" case is more common
> is
> an empiric one.
>
> I have seen an awful lot of "everybody loses" cases. I've seen very few
> "everybody wins" cases.
>
> DS
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-19 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <aQmTc-5A5-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-07-18 19:42 ` GPL version 4 Bodo Eggert
2008-07-19 0:47 ` David Schwartz
2008-07-19 3:05 ` Eric Furman [this message]
[not found] ` <E1KKQd9-000114-IV@fencepost.gnu.org>
2008-07-20 8:34 ` Aleksej Saushev
2008-07-20 12:21 ` Charles L. Nelson
2008-07-20 15:15 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-07-17 8:31 Julian H. Stacey
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-16 21:31 Morton Harrow
2008-07-16 21:41 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-16 22:23 ` Matthias Kilian
2008-12-14 21:12 ` Mark Kirkwood
2008-12-15 0:27 ` Marco Peereboom
2008-12-15 1:31 ` Mark Kirkwood
2008-12-15 1:44 ` bofh
2008-12-15 1:43 ` Damien Miller
[not found] ` <E1LCDed-0001OK-UC@fencepost.gnu.org>
2008-12-15 20:51 ` Chad Perrin
2008-07-16 22:06 ` David Collier-Brown
2008-07-17 21:17 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2008-07-17 21:24 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-16 22:08 ` Al Viro
2008-07-17 2:12 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-07-17 11:21 ` Alexandre Oliva
2008-07-16 18:09 Morton Harrow
2008-07-16 18:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-16 19:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-16 21:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1216436702.17606.1264270853@webmail.messagingengine.com \
--to=ericfurman@fastmail.net \
--cc=7eggert@gmx.de \
--cc=announce@fsfeurope.org \
--cc=claire.newman@canonical.com \
--cc=davids@webmaster.com \
--cc=fedora-list@redhat.com \
--cc=freebsd-questions@freebsd.org \
--cc=licensing@fsf.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=mharrow@linuxmail.org \
--cc=miod@online.fr \
--cc=netbsd-users@netbsd.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).