linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric Furman" <ericfurman@fastmail.net>
To: davids@webmaster.com, 7eggert@gmx.de,
	"Morton Harrow" <mharrow@linuxmail.org>,
	"Kasper Sandberg" <lkml@metanurb.dk>,
	"Miod Vallat" <miod@online.fr>,
	licensing@fsf.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Richard Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>,
	claire.newman@canonical.com, announce@fsfeurope.org,
	ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com, fedora-list@redhat.com,
	netbsd-users@netbsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: GPL version 4
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:05:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216436702.17606.1264270853@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKAEJDOEAC.davids@webmaster.com>

Could you guys please remove misc@openbsd.org from the cc
of this mail? Nobody here cares.

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:47:46 -0700, "David Schwartz"
<davids@webmaster.com> said:
> > Would you grant me the freedom to give away your commercial
> > product for free
> > or to incorporate it in my commercial product? Probably not. You'd instead
> > grant me less freedom. The GPL protects me from this.
> 
> Except it doesn't. With or without the GPL, if he still makes his
> commercial
> product, you will still be unable to give it away or incorporate it in
> your
> commercial product. If he doesn't make it, that's just less choice for
> everyone.
> 
> It may be a poorer product. It may cost him more to develop it. It may
> wind
> up not existing. But in no case will will you wind up with the freedom to
> give away his commercial product. So the GPL actually won't protect you
> from
> this at all.
> 
> It will just result in him producing a poorer, more expensive, less
> compatible product -- or none at all. Either way, everyone else will have
> fewer (and/or poorer) choices. Everyone loses. Nobody wins.
> 
> Note that had he been able to incorporate the GPL code in his commercial
> product, he may have passed bug fixes and improvements back to the GPL
> project. He would not have had to, of course, but if his product just
> uses a
> GPL component or library (that doesn't compete with the larger product),
> there's no reason for him not to. Everybody could have won.
> 
> It's always possible he may instead elect to make a GPL'd project. This
> may
> allow him to produce a higher-quality product in less time. It may allow
> others to build on his work, and result in more freedom for everyone. He
> may
> make less money, but maybe not. The question of whether the "everybody
> loses" or the "lots of people, maybe everybody, wins" case is more common
> is
> an empiric one.
> 
> I have seen an awful lot of "everybody loses" cases. I've seen very few
> "everybody wins" cases.
> 
> DS
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-19  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <aQmTc-5A5-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-07-18 19:42 ` GPL version 4 Bodo Eggert
2008-07-19  0:47   ` David Schwartz
2008-07-19  3:05     ` Eric Furman [this message]
     [not found]     ` <E1KKQd9-000114-IV@fencepost.gnu.org>
2008-07-20  8:34       ` Aleksej Saushev
2008-07-20 12:21         ` Charles L. Nelson
2008-07-20 15:15         ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-07-17  8:31 Julian H. Stacey
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-16 21:31 Morton Harrow
2008-07-16 21:41 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-16 22:23   ` Matthias Kilian
2008-12-14 21:12   ` Mark Kirkwood
2008-12-15  0:27     ` Marco Peereboom
2008-12-15  1:31       ` Mark Kirkwood
2008-12-15  1:44         ` bofh
2008-12-15  1:43     ` Damien Miller
     [not found]     ` <E1LCDed-0001OK-UC@fencepost.gnu.org>
2008-12-15 20:51       ` Chad Perrin
2008-07-16 22:06 ` David Collier-Brown
2008-07-17 21:17   ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2008-07-17 21:24     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-16 22:08 ` Al Viro
2008-07-17  2:12 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-07-17 11:21 ` Alexandre Oliva
2008-07-16 18:09 Morton Harrow
2008-07-16 18:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-16 19:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-16 21:48 ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1216436702.17606.1264270853@webmail.messagingengine.com \
    --to=ericfurman@fastmail.net \
    --cc=7eggert@gmx.de \
    --cc=announce@fsfeurope.org \
    --cc=claire.newman@canonical.com \
    --cc=davids@webmaster.com \
    --cc=fedora-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=freebsd-questions@freebsd.org \
    --cc=licensing@fsf.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@metanurb.dk \
    --cc=mharrow@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=miod@online.fr \
    --cc=netbsd-users@netbsd.org \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).