From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [rfc-patch, bugfix] x86-microcode
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:42:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1217778135.4912.40.camel@earth> (raw)
Hi,
[ consider it a pre-release and RFC... I'm a bit in hurry now and just send what I have got by this moment.
Although, I expect it to be workable ]
this change is supposed to fix bug#11197 (note, its name "Oops in microcode sysfs registration" is misleading)
The problem description can be found here:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0807.3/3791.html
or
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/24/260
perhaps it does look quite bulky for -rc, although it's mainly move-redesign-some-bits of the code and
I tried to preserve the original logic (even if it looked like a possible optimizations might had been applied)
as much as possible.
The basic idea is that we introduce another mechanism to run ucode-updates on a target cpu
and replace set_cpus_allowed_ptr() in (1) cpu-hotplug events and (2) module load.
[1/2] x86-microcode: generic updates
Basically, it introduces microcode_update_cpu() which can be run either from start_secondary()
(perhaps via a function pointer) or scheduled via keventd ([2/2]) and reworks the logic of cpu-hotplug events.
[2/2] x86-microcode: do updates via workqueue
More testing is necessary. I tested without ucode-package (so only generic machinery) and for
- load/unload module;
- cpu-hotplug (so it doesn't give an oops anymore)
hm, suspend/resume seems to be broken even without the 'microcode' module (will check the date of my previous kernel).
--Dmitry
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-03 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-03 15:42 Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2008-08-04 19:31 ` [rfc-patch, bugfix] x86-microcode Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-04 20:01 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-04 21:32 ` Max Krasnyansky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1217778135.4912.40.camel@earth \
--to=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peter.oruba@amd.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox